0A4F4F9BD490A749D5437F821CF06DF1
Opinion No. 52: Use of Human Tissues and Cells in Reproductive Medicine (2012)
https://www.health.belgium.be/sites/default/files/uploads/fields/fpshealth_theme_file/opinion_52_web.pdf
http://leaux.net/URLS/ConvertAPI Text Files/9C4096636499E0E1B0E59FB1CD2AEB15.en.txt
Examining the file media/Synopses/9C4096636499E0E1B0E59FB1CD2AEB15.html:
This file was generated: 2020-07-14 06:44:36
| Indicators in focus are typically shown highlighted in yellow; | Peer Indicators (that share the same Vulnerability association) are shown highlighted in pink; | "Outside" Indicators (those that do NOT share the same Vulnerability association) are shown highlighted in green; | Trigger Words/Phrases are shown highlighted in gray. | 
Link to Orphaned Trigger Words (Appendix (Indicator List, Indicator Peers, Trigger Words, Type/Vulnerability/Indicator Overlay)
Applicable Type / Vulnerability / Indicator Overlay for this Input
Health / HIV/AIDS
Searching for indicator HIV:
(return to top)
           
p.000002:  beneficence and non-maleficence. 
p.000002:  The principle of beneficence means that we must try to maximise the quantity of “good”. Applied  to  the  medical 
p.000002:  context,  this  means  that  the  costs  incurred  must  be  beneficial. Performing  useless  tests  or  those  for 
p.000002:  which  results  are  not  conclusive  is  a  waste  of scarce resources.  More  “good”  can  be  generated  by  this 
p.000002:  money  on  the  basis  of  more  judiciously allocated means. 
p.000002:  The second principle is that of non-maleficence. A medical procedure that causes harm must be justified by a) a 
p.000002:  relative advantage compared to the application of another ethical principle; 
p.000002:  b) the certainty of preventing greater harm. Harm to the donor (testing, sampling) is justified by the concern for 
p.000002:  preventing harm (contamination) to the recipient. If it is obvious that the tests do not protect against any 
p.000002:  contamination or if another procedure can achieve the same result by causing less harm, then there is cause to amend 
p.000002:  the regulations as a consequence. 
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:  1.   Donation between partners other than for immediate use 
p.000002:   
p.000002:  Is it necessary to conduct blood tests repeated at each collection of gametes in couples treated, even if sperm and 
p.000002:  autologous oocytes of the couple in treatment are used8? 
p.000002:   
p.000002:  According to the present regulations, virological analysis for HIV, hepatitis B and C (HBV and HCV) and syphilis is 
p.000002:  required (with or without PCR/NAT9) at each procedure involving oocytes 
p.000002:   
p.000002:  Law of 19 December 2008 on procurement and use of human body material intended for human medical applications  or  for 
p.000002:  purposes  of  scientific  research, hereafter  designated  as  the  “human body  material (2008)” law. 
p.000002:  6  Cited on the last page of this opinion. 
p.000002:  7   Beauchamp T.L., Childress J.F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Oxford University Press, 6th ed., 2008 (French 
p.000002:  translation Les principes de l'éthique biomédicale, Paris, Les Belles Lettres, Médecine & Sciences humaines, 2008). 
p.000002:  8   See Art. 4.2. of  Annex IV  of the  Royal Decree  “quality and safety standards (2009)”:  “Blood samples must be 
p.000002:  collected upon donation” (“general conditions for determining biological markers”) and Articles 
p.000002:  2.1. to 2.6.; see also Art. 4.2. of Annex III of the aforementioned directive of 8 February 2006. 
p.000002:  9PCR  (polymerase  chain  reaction)  designates  a  modern  technique  for  DNA  analysis  lending  itself  to 
p.000002:  automation  and  using  the  molecular  biology  of  in  vitro  DNA  amplification.  Polymerase  or  reverse 
p.000002:  transcriptase is an enzyme associated with carcinogenic viruses, those of some leukaemias and that of AIDS (HIV), and 
p.000002:  allows this RNA virus to incorporate itself into the chromosomes of the cell it infects and that are made of DNA. PCR 
p.000002:  allows for example a bacterium or virus to be identified or a gene mutation to be revealed to diagnose a genetic 
p.000002:  disease  (Dictionnaire Garnier-Delamare des termes de médecine, Paris, Maloine, 30th   ed., 2009, see  "gene 
p.000002:  amplification" and  "reverse transcriptase").  The  Royal Decree uses NAT (Nucleic Acid Amplification Technology), 
p.000002:  which designates the same technique for nucleic acid amplification, instead of PCR. 
p.000002:   
p.000002:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000003:  3 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  or sperm in the two partners of a couple in the context of a medically assisted procreation procedure, in the case of 
p.000003:  other than immediate use. This high frequency is very difficult to defend and hardly feasible in practice: 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  A/ The risk of exogenous contamination by diseases during treatment is very low. This is moreover confirmed in 
p.000003:  international studies10. 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  B/ Systematic monitoring in order to protect the laboratory personnel is meaningless, given  that  the  entire 
p.000003:  procedure  must  take  place  in  a  completely  sterile  environment where the personnel must always observe standard 
p.000003:  sterility precautions11. 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  C/  Systematic  monitoring  and  repeated  performance  of  blood  analyses  at  each donation generate a resulting 
p.000003:  additional cost for the community. The  additional cost for INAMI12  in Belgium is approximately 4.8 million euro13. 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  D/  Given  that  at  present  no contamination  has  been  reported in  major  international studies14,  the 
p.000003:  investment  of  such  a  significant  sum  of  public  money  for  such  a  low benefit is difficult to justify from an 
p.000003:  ethical point of view. 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  E/  Physical  and  psychological  pressure  is  also  added  to  the  financial  factor,  as  the patients  must 
p.000003:  submit  to  blood  sampling  and  appear  each  time  for  a  series  of procedures. 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  F/ A recent study by the Belgian Society of Reproductive Medicine (BSRM)15   has shown that various intervals between 
p.000003:  virological tests are assigned in the various countries of the  European  Union.  They  are  as  follows:  Norway  12 
p.000003:  months,  Denmark  24  months, Finland and Sweden 12 to 24 months, Poland 6 months, France less than 6 months for the 
p.000003:  first cycle and then every 24 months. In Germany, examinations must take place one  week  before  oocyte  collection. 
p.000003:  In  Italy,  the  period  is  3  months;  in  Greece, screening  is  advised  before  the  first  sperm  donation  and 
p.000003:  after  three  to  four  cycles. Finally, in Latvia, a check is required every 6 months. 
p.000003:  Moreover,  a  European  bill  exists  to  limit  repetition  of  testing  to  one  test  every  24 months16. 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  Recommendation 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  In the light of these aspects and on the basis of the information collected on the international scale,  it  is 
p.000003:  proposed  that  virological  analysis  for  HIV,  hepatitis  B  and  C  and  syphilis  be performed  only  at  the 
p.000003:  first  procedure  and  conducted  afterward  only  at  12-month  intervals. 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  10     Wingfield  M.,  Cottell  E.,   Viral  screening  of  couples   undergoing  partner  donation   in  assisted 
p.000003:  reproduction  with  regard  to  EU  Directives  2004/23/EC,  2006/17/EC  and  2006/86/EC:  what  is  the evidence  for 
p.000003:  repeated  screening?  E.  Hum  Reprod.  2010;  25(12):3058-65.  Pepas  L.,  Macmahon  E.,  El Toukhy T., Khalaf Y. & 
p.000003:  Braude P., Viral screening before each cycle of assisted conception treatment is expensive  and  unnecessary:  a 
p.000003:  survey  of  results  from  a  UK  inner  city  clinic ,  Human  Fertility,  2011; 14(4):224-229. 
p.000003:  11  See Annex VII of the aforementioned Royal Decree “quality and safety standards (2009)” (text attached in the 
p.000003:  Appendix). 
p.000003:  12  The National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance. 
p.000003:  13  Estimate of Prof. Devroey P. at the 21st  BSRM meeting, 30 January 2009, Elewijt Center, Zemst. 
p.000003:  14  Wingfield M. et al., op. cit.; Pepas L. et al., op. cit. 
p.000003:  15  Belgian Society for Reproductive Medicine, chaired by Prof. A. Delvigne. 
p.000003:  16  Summary Report of the Meeting of the Competent Authorities for Tissues and Cells, 23-24 June 2011, available  at 
p.000003:  http://ec.europa.eu/health/blood_tissues_organs/docs/tissues_mi_20110623_en.pdf   “The NCAs group concluded that it was 
p.000003:  not needed to maintain the current testing requirements for partner donation as laid down in Annex III of Directive 
p.000003:  2006/17/EC. This will require a future amendment of the Directive, through the regulatory procedure. It is the 
p.000003:  responsibility of the NCAs to ensure that ART tissue establishments have in place the appropriate safety and quality 
p.000003:  systems, which does not affect the safety and quality of reproductive cells and/or human health when donors are tested 
p.000003:  at up to 24 months time intervals”. 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000004:  4 
p.000004:   
p.000004:  This  would  correspond  to  the  international  consensus  published  in  a  number  of  scientific publications17. 
p.000004:   
p.000004:  With this adaptation, a balance can be reached between greater safety on the one hand and costs and burdens on the 
p.000004:  donor/partner on the other hand. In this regard, reference can  be made  to  an  article  from  the  American  Medical 
p.000004:  Association:  The  Harms  of  Screening,  New Attention to an Old Concern 18. 
p.000004:   
p.000004:  In  a  discussion  of  preventive  diagnostic  examinations,  false  positive  results  can  never  be forgotten, nor 
p.000004:  the burden of additional examinations. In this context, it should also be noted that these useless additional 
p.000004:  examinations sometimes represent a high cost to the community and thus uselessly squander the scant resources essential 
p.000004:  to the curative sector19. 
p.000004:   
p.000004:   
p.000004:  2.   Sperm  and  oocyte  donation,  fresh  or  after  cryopreservation,  other  than  partner donation 
p.000004:   
p.000004:  2. 1. Virological analyses required for sperm donation other partner donation 
p.000004:   
p.000004:  2.1.1. Technical data 
p.000004:   
p.000004:  Current  regulations  require  virological  testing20    at  least  for  HIV,  hepatitis  B  and  C, syphilis  and 
p.000004:  chlamydia  (by  PCR  =  NAT  test  or  not)  at  each  consecutive  donation  of sperm by the same donor21. 
p.000004:   
p.000004:  17  Bhargava P.M., On the critical assessment of the impact of the recent European Union Tissues and Cells Directive. 
p.000004:  Reprod Biomed Online, 2005; 11(2):161. 
p.000004:  Hartshorne G.M., Challenge of the EU ‘tissues and cells’ directive. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 11: 404- 407. 
p.000004:  Mortimer  D.A.,  Critical  assessment  of  the  impact  of  the  European  Union  Tissues  and  Cells  Directive (2004) 
p.000004:  on  laboratory  practices  in  assisted  conception,  Reprod  Biomed  Online,  2005;  11(2):162-176. European  Society 
p.000004:  of  Human  Reproduction  and  Embryology  (ESHRE),  Statement  2009  on  the  European commission proposal of viral 
p.000004:  screening in assisted reproduction treatments (www.eshre.eu). Hughes C., Emerson  G.,  Grundy  K.,  Kelly  P.,  Mocanu 
p.000004:  E.,  Is  performing  viral  screening  within  30  days  of  oocyte collection justified?, Hum Reprod, 2010; 25:239. 
p.000004:  Janssens P.M., Rules and regulations in reproductive medicine: sensible requirements that should start with evidence, 
p.000004:  Hum Reprod. 2010; 25(12):3055-7. 2010. 
p.000004:  Wingfield M. et al., op. cit. 
p.000004:  18 Woolf S H., Harris R., The Harms of Screening, New Attention to an Old Concern, JAMA, 2012-Vol 307, No 6, p.565-566. 
p.000004:  19 N.B. We will not consider here examinations carried out with a view to treatment of the person himself (too-advanced 
p.000004:  preventive examinations) nor the harm caused by useless treatments (by the examination itself and also – this is not 
p.000004:  rare – through additional treatments that can lead to serious injuries). For this type  of  issue,  one  can  refer  to 
p.000004:  a  (more  general)  article  published  in  Lancet:  The  perils  of  excessive medical  care,  by  Shangavi  D.M., 
p.000004:  Lancet,  2011;  377,  1561-1562,  and  also  the  article  Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick  in the Pursuit  of 
p.000004:  Health,  M.D., 2011 by Welch H.G.G., Schwartz L.M., Woloshin S., which refers to the healthcare saga of Brian Mulroney, 
p.000004:  who was Prime Minister of Canada from 1984 to 1993. A preventive helicoidal scan of the thorax showed that he had two 
p.000004:  small nodules on the lung. A biopsy showed them to be completely benign. But the patient had to be hospitalised three 
p.000004:  months for this reason, and because of a complication due to the biopsy, developed life-threatening pancreatitis. 
p.000004:  20Serology does not allow the virus itself to be detected. As for all diseases, it only allows the traces of its 
p.000004:  passage to be detected, that is, the antibodies that are produced by the body in response to its “attack”. The 
p.000004:  antibodies produced are specific for each disease; a blood test detects only the antibodies for the disease 
p.000004:  that            it            is            supposed            to            detect            (see            notably 
p.000004:  http://www.3trois3.com/experience_pratique_du_sdrp/5-interets-des-differentes-techniques-d-analyses- 
p.000004:  :-serologie-pcr-s_606/;  Plantier  J.-C.  and  Simon  F.  (UHC  Charles  Nicolle  Virology  Laboratory,  Rouen), 
p.000004:  “Diagnostic sérologique des infections à VIH (Serological diagnosis of HIV infections)”, Développement et Santé, no. 
p.000004:  162, December 2002). 
p.000004:  21Royal Decree “quality and safety standards (2009)”, Art. 9 §2: “Donors of gametes, gonads, fragments of gonads, 
p.000004:  foetal human body material and embryos are subject to the biological tests specified in items 1, 2 and 3 of Annex IV 
p.000004:  (items 3.2 to 3.4, cf. text attached to this opinion). The biological tests specified in paragraph 1 are conducted 
p.000004:  according to the general provisions of item 4 in Annex IV.” 
p.000004:   
p.000004:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000005:  5 
p.000005:   
p.000005:  We note that item 4.2 of Annex IV of the Royal Decree “quality and safety standards (2009)” reads as follows: “Les 
p.000005:  échantillons de sang doivent être prélevés lors du don (Blood  samples  must  be  collected  at  donation)”,  while  in 
p.000005:  the  corresponding  Dutch version   we  read:   4.2.  “Bloedmonsters  worden   op  het  tijdstip  van  de   donation 
p.000005:  afgenomen (Blood samples are collected at the time of donation)”. This difference in translation gives rise to a 
p.000005:  divergence in interpretation. 
p.000005:   
p.000005:  These  sperm  donations  generally  take  place  twice  per  week,  with  repetition  of  the aforementioned tests each 
p.000005:  time, while the sperm is frozen each time. The reliability of the  result  of  the  PCR  conducted  immediately  after 
p.000005:  contamination  (in  acute  cases)  is inadequate in this respect. 
p.000005:   
p.000005:  2.1.2. Precautions to be observed 
p.000005:   
p.000005:  A  quarantine  of  a  minimum  of  180  days  after  the  last  sperm  donation22    must  be observed, as has already 
p.000005:  been practised for years in all the approved centres. Only at the end of this quarantine period is the previously 
p.000005:  described viral serology again tested for the donor23. 
p.000005:   
...
           
p.000005:  of candidate  sperm donors  at  present  in our  country and every complication in the procedure only exacerbates this 
p.000005:  shortage. 
p.000005:   
p.000005:  The  Committee  thus  also  proposes  that,  for  sperm  donation  other  than  partner donation,  the  standard 
p.000005:  method  existing  up  to  now  be  reinstituted.  It  involves conducting an in-depth virological and bacteriological 
p.000005:  test in a very short period before the  first  donation.  The  sperm  samples  donated  are  then  frozen.  There 
p.000005:  follows  a quarantine  period  of  180  days,  at  the  end  of  which  a  new  clinical  examination  and serological 
p.000005:  test are performed in order to exclude in this way any risk. By combining these  two  factors,  safe  sperm  donation 
p.000005:  can  be  maintained  without  additional  and repeated blood tests. 
p.000005:   
p.000005:   
p.000005:   
p.000005:  22Royal Decree “quality and safety standards (2009)”, Art. 12: “Human body material is kept in quarantine until  it 
p.000005:  can be  released  in application of  Article  17”.  And Annex IV, item 4.3:  “Donations  of  gametes, embryos,  gonads 
p.000005:  and  fragments  of  gonads  other  than  partner  donations,  or  donations  of  gametes intended for the use of 
p.000005:  surplus embryos, are put into quarantine for a minimum of 180 days, at the end of which period the tests must be 
p.000005:  recommenced”. 
p.000005:  23See however Article 4.3. of Annex 3 of the directive of 8 February 2006: “Sperm donations other than partner 
p.000005:  donations  are  put  into  quarantine  for  a minimum  of  one  hundred  eighty  days, at the  end  of which period 
p.000005:  tests must be recommenced. If the blood sample collected at the time of donation is also tested  for  HIV,  HBV  and 
p.000005:  HCV  using  the  nucleic  acid  amplification  technique,  it  is  not  necessary  to recommence the examination on 
p.000005:  another blood sample. Likewise, it is not necessary to recommence the examination  when  the  processing  procedure 
p.000005:  includes  a  validated  inactivation  step  for  the  viruses concerned.” 
p.000005:   
p.000005:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000006:  6 
p.000006:   
p.000006:  2. 2.  Donation of fresh oocytes 
p.000006:   
p.000006:  As stated above, Annex III of the aforementioned directive of 8 February 2006 (Art. 4.2.) and Annex IV of the 
p.000006:  aforementioned Royal Decree of 28 September 2009 (Art. 4.2.) indicate, in the general  conditions  for  determination 
p.000006:  of  biological  markers,  that  blood  samples  must  be collected upon donation of oocytes. This also specifies the 
p.000006:  time when tests are conducted for HIV, HBV and HCV using the nucleic acid amplification technique (NAT). 
p.000006:   
p.000006:  The  result  of  the  PCR  test  can  generally  be  obtained  after  approximately  72  hours  at  the earliest. 
p.000006:   
p.000006:  This is why the Committee puts forward the following recommendations: 
p.000006:   
p.000006:  Recommendations 
p.000006:   
p.000006:  A/ It would be preferable to perform this analysis within a certain time period before the donation of oocytes. This 
p.000006:  period can be 14 days to 3 weeks maximum. In this way, results would already be known at the time of implantation into 
p.000006:  the recipient. Clearly, the safety of the procedure would be increased. 
p.000006:   
p.000006:  B/   In   this   regard,   the   Committee   declares   itself   in   favour   of   vitrification24,   a preservation 
p.000006:  technique  currently perfectly developed. Although this technique is still only authorised in six university centres, 
p.000006:  the Committee believes, on the basis of the current scientific data25, that the vitrification technique should be 
p.000006:  preferred henceforth to donation of fresh oocytes, for the reasons that: 
p.000006:   
p.000006:  -     there   is   no  difference   in   viability   or   reproductive   capacity   between   an   oocyte transplanted 
p.000006:  after vitrification and a fresh transplanted oocyte (1), 
p.000006:  -     on the other hand, the safety of the transfer after 6 months of vitrification is greater than in the case of 
p.000006:  transfer of a fresh oocyte (2). 
p.000006:   
p.000006:   
p.000006:  2. 3.           Tests  necessary  in  the  case  of donation and  cryopreservation of oocytes for subsequent use 
p.000006:   
p.000006:  It is again26  required that virological tests by PCR/NAT be conducted at each donation. 
p.000006:   
p.000006:   
...
           
p.000008:  certain  provisions  applied  to  the  Centres  for medically assisted procreation. 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  1.   Article 6, §1, of the Royal Decree “quality and safety standards (2009)”, dealing with (1) the  guarantee  of 
p.000008:  traceability  of  all  human  body  material  (gametes  and  embryos) collected,  procured,  processed,  stored  or 
p.000008:  distributed,  goes  too  far  in  that  it  also involves (2) all the pertinent data on the products and materials 
p.000008:  coming into contact with this human body material. 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  Requirement  (1) poses  no problem;  (2) does, due  to the  fact  that  traceability  of the products  and  materials 
p.000008:  is  required  retroactively,  which  raises  a  significant  ethical problem. 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  2.   In the past, traceability of all these human body materials as well as the products and materials coming into 
p.000008:  contact with them has not been observed in practice. 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  3.   The consequence of this is that thousands of cryopreserved gametes and embryos can no longer serve the purposes 
p.000008:  initially planned, those of satisfying a future desire for pregnancy, even in the patients from whom these human body 
p.000008:  materials come. 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  The Committee unanimously believes that, in this specific case, these regulations are not ethically defensible in their 
p.000008:  consequences. The request is therefore made to the legislator that transitional measures be taken so that these gametes 
p.000008:  and embryos can still be used. The current regulations impose the following biological tests30: 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  3.1. Concerning partner donation other than for immediate use as specified in item 1, the Royal Decree requires a 
p.000008:  series of biological tests for HIV, hepatitis B and C, syphilis and  chlamydia  to  be  conducted  at  each  donation 
p.000008:  of  gametes  not  intended  for immediate use within a couple. 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  These  requirements  are  not  scientifically  based  and  moreover  impose  an  additional useless burden on patients, 
p.000008:  personnel and the healthcare  budget. A sounder way  of proceeding from a scientific and economic point of view would 
p.000008:  consist of repeating a test  every  12  months  after  a  first  test  of  the  biological  markers  (more  precisely 
p.000008:  described in 2.2. above). 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  30    With  reference  to  Annex  IV  and  to  Section  3,  Art.  9 §2  of  the  Royal  Decree  “quality  and  safety 
p.000008:  standards (2009)”. In Chapter IV, Section 2, Art. 8 §1 on donor selection, in particular in item 2°, the selection 
p.000008:  criteria taken into account for donors of gametes, gonads, fragments of gonads and embryos intended for assisted 
p.000008:  procreation are listed. 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000009:  9 
p.000009:   
p.000009:  3.2.  With  regard  to  donations  other  than  between  partners  after  cryopreservation, whether donation of sperm 
p.000009:  or oocytes, it is also required several times that tests be performed at each donation. 
p.000009:   
p.000009:  The  Committee  believes  that  it  would  be  more  reasonable  –  scientifically  as  well  as ethically – to 
p.000009:  strictly apply the “quarantine principle”. According to this, (1) biological testing  takes  place  before 
p.000009:  collection(s),  (2)  the  cells  or  tissues  are  frozen,  (3)  the results of the tests are communicated after an 
p.000009:  additional check of the biological tests (after 180 days). 
p.000009:  In the present state of science, given the possibility of vitrifying oocytes and given that there   is   no 
...
           
p.000011:  50 years. 
p.000011:  § 4. The data specified in §§2 and 3, paragraph 2, are kept in the procuring establishment immediately after 
p.000011:  collection. 
p.000011:  In the event of application of Article 8, §2, paragraph 3 of the law, the data specified in §§2 and 3 are preserved by 
p.000011:  the bank of human body material responsible, as specified in Article 8, 
p.000011:  §2, paragraph 4 of the law. 
p.000011:   
p.000011:  Annex IV 
p.000011:  Selection criteria and biological tests required for donors of gametes, embryos, gonads and fragments of gonads 
p.000011:  intended for assisted procreation 
p.000011:   
p.000011:  1. Partner donations for immediate use without storage or processing. 
p.000011:  The  donor  selection  criteria  and  laboratory  tests  do not  apply  in  the  case  of a  donation  of male gametes 
p.000011:  between partners for immediate use. 
p.000011:   
p.000011:  2. Partner donations other than for immediate use, as specified in item 1. 
p.000011:   
p.000011:   
p.000011:   
p.000011:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000012:  12 
p.000012:   
p.000012:  Gametes, gonads, fragments of gonads and  embryos that  are processed and/or stored and gametes  which  will  result 
p.000012:  in  embryos  that  will  be  cryopreserved  must  fulfil  the  following criteria: 
p.000012:  2.1.  The  treating  physician  of  the  donor  must  verify  and  document,  on  the  basis  of  the medical  history 
p.000012:  of  the  patient  and  the  therapeutic  indications,  the  justifications  for  the donation and the safety of the 
p.000012:  donation for the recipient and for any child that may be born from this donation. 
p.000012:  2.2.  The  following  biological  tests  must  be  performed  to  evaluate  the  risk  of  cross- contamination: 
p.000012:  - anti-HIV-1, 2 
p.000012:  - HBsAg 
p.000012:  - anti-HBc 
p.000012:  - anti-HCV 
p.000012:  - a syphilis screening test. 
p.000012:  In the case of sperm processed with a view to intrauterine insemination, not intended to be preserved, and if the 
p.000012:  establishment can demonstrate that the risk of cross-contamination and exposure of personnel has been taken into 
p.000012:  account through use of validated procedures, the biological tests are not necessarily performed. 
p.000012:  2.3. If the results of the tests for HIV 1 and 2, hepatitis B or C are positive or not available, or if  the  donor 
p.000012:  proves  to  be  a  source  of  infectious  risk,  a  separate  storage  system  must  be provided. 
p.000012:  2.4. Tests for HTLV-I antibodies must be performed in the case of donors living in areas with a high incidence  of this 
p.000012:  infection  or  originally  from these areas, or  whose sexual partners  or parents originate from these areas. 
p.000012:  2.5 In some circumstances, additional tests must be performed, depending on trips made by the donor, his exposure to 
p.000012:  risks, and the characteristics of the human body material donated (for example, RhD, malaria, CMV, T cruzi). 
p.000012:  2.6. Positive results do not necessarily rule out partner donation. 
p.000012:   
p.000012:  3. Donations other than partner donations. 
p.000012:  Aside from partner donations, use of gametes, embryos and gonads or fragments of gonads must fulfil the following 
p.000012:  criteria: 
p.000012:  3.1. Donors must be selected as a function of their age, their state of health and their medical histories,  on  the 
p.000012:  basis  of  a  questionnaire  and  an  interview  with  a  qualified  healthcare professional trained to this effect. 
p.000012:  This evaluation must involve all the pertinent factors that can contribute to identifying and excluding persons whose 
p.000012:  donation could be hazardous to the  health  of another, notably  the  possibility  of  transmitting  diseases 
p.000012:  (sexually  transmitted infections, for example), or to their own health (for example, superovulation, sedation, risks 
p.000012:  related to harvesting ova, or psychological consequences related to the donation). 
p.000012:  3.2. The HIV 1 and 2, HCV, and HBV tests and the syphilis test made on a serum or plasma sample  from  the  donor  in 
p.000012:  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  Annex  VI,  item  1.1,  must  be negative for donors. In addition, chlamydia 
p.000012:  tests made on a urine sample using the nucleic acid amplification technique must be negative for sperm donors. 
p.000012:  3.3.  The  HTLV-I  antibody  test  must  be  performed  for  donors  living  in  areas  with  a  high incidence of this 
p.000012:  infection or originally from such areas, or whose sexual partners or parents originate from these areas. 
p.000012:  3.4. In some circumstances, additional tests must be performed, depending on the history of the  donor  and  the 
p.000012:  characteristics  of  the  human  body  material  donated  (for  example,  RhD, malaria, CMV, T. cruzi). 
p.000012:  3.5. For autologous donors, the provisions of Annex II, item 2.1.1 are applicable. 
p.000012:  3.6. After consent to this effect has been granted: 
p.000012:  a) genetic screening is performed for the autosomal recessive genes prevalent in the ethnic context of the donor, 
p.000012:  according to international scientific knowledge; 
p.000012:  b)  the  risk  of  transmission  of  hereditary  disorders  known  to  be  present  in  the  family  is evaluated. 
p.000012:  The  recipient  is  fully  and  intelligibly  informed  of  the  associated  risks  and  of the  measures taken to 
p.000012:  reduce them. 
p.000012:   
p.000012:   
p.000012:   
p.000012:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000013:  13 
p.000013:   
p.000013:  4. General conditions for determining biological markers. 
p.000013:  4.1. Tests must be performed in accordance with Annex VI, items 2.1 and 2.2. 
p.000013:  4.2. Blood samples must be collected at donation. 
p.000013:  4.3.  Donations  of  gametes,  embryos,  gonads  and  fragments  of  gonads  other  than  partner donations  or 
p.000013:  donations  of  gametes  intended  for  use  for  surplus  embryos  are  put  into quarantine for at least 180 days, a 
p.000013:  period at the end of which the tests must be recommenced. If the blood sample from the donor at the time of donation is 
p.000013:  also tested using the nucleic acid amplification technique (NAT) for HIV, HBV and HCV, it is not necessary to perform 
p.000013:  the tests on a second blood sample or to implement the quarantine specified above. Likewise, it is not  necessary  to 
p.000013:  recommence  the  test  when  the  processing  procedure  includes  a  validated inactivation step for the viruses 
p.000013:  concerned. 
p.000013:   
p.000013:  Annex VII 
p.000013:  Various provisions on the quality and safety of activities in the establishments 
p.000013:   
p.000013:  A. Organisation and management 
p.000013:  1. A manager of human body material should be designated, equipped with the qualifications specified in the law as 
p.000013:  well as  at  least two years  of practical experience in  management  of human body material, including quality, safety 
p.000013:  and traceability. 
p.000013:  2. An establishment must have an organisational structure and standard operating procedures suited to the procedures 
p.000013:  for which approval is requested; an organisational chart must exist which clearly defines the lines of responsibility 
p.000013:  and the hierarchical structure. 
p.000013:  3. The manager of human body material is responsible for the activities of the establishment such as donor selection, 
p.000013:  evaluation of clinical data on the human body material used or any interactions with clinical users. 
p.000013:  4. A documented quality  management system must be applied to the procedures for  which approval  is  requested, in 
p.000013:  compliance  with  the  standards  set  by the  law  and  by the  present decree. 
p.000013:  5. It should be ensured that the risks inherent in use and handing of human body material are identified  and  reduced 
p.000013:  insofar  as  possible,  while  maintaining  a  level  of  quality  and  safety appropriate for the use for which the 
p.000013:  human body material is intended. These risks include notably those related to procedures, the environment and the state 
...
Health / Mentally Disabled
Searching for indicator disability:
(return to top)
           
p.000003:  months,  Denmark  24  months, Finland and Sweden 12 to 24 months, Poland 6 months, France less than 6 months for the 
p.000003:  first cycle and then every 24 months. In Germany, examinations must take place one  week  before  oocyte  collection. 
p.000003:  In  Italy,  the  period  is  3  months;  in  Greece, screening  is  advised  before  the  first  sperm  donation  and 
p.000003:  after  three  to  four  cycles. Finally, in Latvia, a check is required every 6 months. 
p.000003:  Moreover,  a  European  bill  exists  to  limit  repetition  of  testing  to  one  test  every  24 months16. 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  Recommendation 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  In the light of these aspects and on the basis of the information collected on the international scale,  it  is 
p.000003:  proposed  that  virological  analysis  for  HIV,  hepatitis  B  and  C  and  syphilis  be performed  only  at  the 
p.000003:  first  procedure  and  conducted  afterward  only  at  12-month  intervals. 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  10     Wingfield  M.,  Cottell  E.,   Viral  screening  of  couples   undergoing  partner  donation   in  assisted 
p.000003:  reproduction  with  regard  to  EU  Directives  2004/23/EC,  2006/17/EC  and  2006/86/EC:  what  is  the evidence  for 
p.000003:  repeated  screening?  E.  Hum  Reprod.  2010;  25(12):3058-65.  Pepas  L.,  Macmahon  E.,  El Toukhy T., Khalaf Y. & 
p.000003:  Braude P., Viral screening before each cycle of assisted conception treatment is expensive  and  unnecessary:  a 
p.000003:  survey  of  results  from  a  UK  inner  city  clinic ,  Human  Fertility,  2011; 14(4):224-229. 
p.000003:  11  See Annex VII of the aforementioned Royal Decree “quality and safety standards (2009)” (text attached in the 
p.000003:  Appendix). 
p.000003:  12  The National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance. 
p.000003:  13  Estimate of Prof. Devroey P. at the 21st  BSRM meeting, 30 January 2009, Elewijt Center, Zemst. 
p.000003:  14  Wingfield M. et al., op. cit.; Pepas L. et al., op. cit. 
p.000003:  15  Belgian Society for Reproductive Medicine, chaired by Prof. A. Delvigne. 
p.000003:  16  Summary Report of the Meeting of the Competent Authorities for Tissues and Cells, 23-24 June 2011, available  at 
p.000003:  http://ec.europa.eu/health/blood_tissues_organs/docs/tissues_mi_20110623_en.pdf   “The NCAs group concluded that it was 
p.000003:  not needed to maintain the current testing requirements for partner donation as laid down in Annex III of Directive 
p.000003:  2006/17/EC. This will require a future amendment of the Directive, through the regulatory procedure. It is the 
p.000003:  responsibility of the NCAs to ensure that ART tissue establishments have in place the appropriate safety and quality 
p.000003:  systems, which does not affect the safety and quality of reproductive cells and/or human health when donors are tested 
p.000003:  at up to 24 months time intervals”. 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000004:  4 
p.000004:   
p.000004:  This  would  correspond  to  the  international  consensus  published  in  a  number  of  scientific publications17. 
p.000004:   
p.000004:  With this adaptation, a balance can be reached between greater safety on the one hand and costs and burdens on the 
p.000004:  donor/partner on the other hand. In this regard, reference can  be made  to  an  article  from  the  American  Medical 
p.000004:  Association:  The  Harms  of  Screening,  New Attention to an Old Concern 18. 
p.000004:   
p.000004:  In  a  discussion  of  preventive  diagnostic  examinations,  false  positive  results  can  never  be forgotten, nor 
p.000004:  the burden of additional examinations. In this context, it should also be noted that these useless additional 
...
Health / Motherhood/Family
Searching for indicator family:
(return to top)
           
p.000012:  (sexually  transmitted infections, for example), or to their own health (for example, superovulation, sedation, risks 
p.000012:  related to harvesting ova, or psychological consequences related to the donation). 
p.000012:  3.2. The HIV 1 and 2, HCV, and HBV tests and the syphilis test made on a serum or plasma sample  from  the  donor  in 
p.000012:  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  Annex  VI,  item  1.1,  must  be negative for donors. In addition, chlamydia 
p.000012:  tests made on a urine sample using the nucleic acid amplification technique must be negative for sperm donors. 
p.000012:  3.3.  The  HTLV-I  antibody  test  must  be  performed  for  donors  living  in  areas  with  a  high incidence of this 
p.000012:  infection or originally from such areas, or whose sexual partners or parents originate from these areas. 
p.000012:  3.4. In some circumstances, additional tests must be performed, depending on the history of the  donor  and  the 
p.000012:  characteristics  of  the  human  body  material  donated  (for  example,  RhD, malaria, CMV, T. cruzi). 
p.000012:  3.5. For autologous donors, the provisions of Annex II, item 2.1.1 are applicable. 
p.000012:  3.6. After consent to this effect has been granted: 
p.000012:  a) genetic screening is performed for the autosomal recessive genes prevalent in the ethnic context of the donor, 
p.000012:  according to international scientific knowledge; 
p.000012:  b)  the  risk  of  transmission  of  hereditary  disorders  known  to  be  present  in  the  family  is evaluated. 
p.000012:  The  recipient  is  fully  and  intelligibly  informed  of  the  associated  risks  and  of the  measures taken to 
p.000012:  reduce them. 
p.000012:   
p.000012:   
p.000012:   
p.000012:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000013:  13 
p.000013:   
p.000013:  4. General conditions for determining biological markers. 
p.000013:  4.1. Tests must be performed in accordance with Annex VI, items 2.1 and 2.2. 
p.000013:  4.2. Blood samples must be collected at donation. 
p.000013:  4.3.  Donations  of  gametes,  embryos,  gonads  and  fragments  of  gonads  other  than  partner donations  or 
p.000013:  donations  of  gametes  intended  for  use  for  surplus  embryos  are  put  into quarantine for at least 180 days, a 
p.000013:  period at the end of which the tests must be recommenced. If the blood sample from the donor at the time of donation is 
p.000013:  also tested using the nucleic acid amplification technique (NAT) for HIV, HBV and HCV, it is not necessary to perform 
p.000013:  the tests on a second blood sample or to implement the quarantine specified above. Likewise, it is not  necessary  to 
p.000013:  recommence  the  test  when  the  processing  procedure  includes  a  validated inactivation step for the viruses 
p.000013:  concerned. 
p.000013:   
p.000013:  Annex VII 
p.000013:  Various provisions on the quality and safety of activities in the establishments 
p.000013:   
p.000013:  A. Organisation and management 
p.000013:  1. A manager of human body material should be designated, equipped with the qualifications specified in the law as 
p.000013:  well as  at  least two years  of practical experience in  management  of human body material, including quality, safety 
p.000013:  and traceability. 
p.000013:  2. An establishment must have an organisational structure and standard operating procedures suited to the procedures 
...
Health / Physically Disabled
Searching for indicator physically:
(return to top)
           
p.000015:  d) or it is not technically possible to perform the required process in a class A environment, for  example  due  to 
p.000015:  the  necessity  for  having  a  specific piece  of  equipment  that  is  not  fully compatible with class A in the 
p.000015:  processing area. 
p.000015:  5. In the situations described in item 4, letters a) to d), the environment must be specified. It should be proven, 
p.000015:  with supporting documents, that the chosen environment guarantees the required  quality  and  safety,  taking  account 
p.000015:  at  least  of  the  planned  use,  the  method  of application and the immune status of the recipient. Appropriate 
p.000015:  clothing, personal protective equipment and hygiene facilities, as  well as written instructions with regard to hygiene 
p.000015:  and apparel, must be provided in each section concerned within the establishment. 
p.000015:  6.  When  the  procedures  for  which  approval  is  requested  involve  storage  of  human  body material, the storage 
p.000015:  conditions necessary to preserve the required properties of the human body material, including key parameters such as 
p.000015:  temperature, humidity or air quality, should be specified. 
p.000015:  7.  Critical  parameters,  including  temperature,  humidity  or  air  quality,  must  be  controlled, monitored and 
p.000015:  recorded to prove their compliance with the required storage conditions. 
p.000015:  8. The storage premises must ensure clear separation and distinction between human body material before release and in 
p.000015:  quarantine, human body material that has been released and human  body  material  that  has  been  rejected,  in  order 
p.000015:  to  prevent  any  confusion  and  cross- contamination between them. In both quarantine areas and storage areas for 
p.000015:  released human body  materials, physically  separated areas  or  secure  storage  or  isolation  systems  are  to be 
p.000015:  provided for storing human body material fulfilling specific criteria. 
p.000015:  The  specific  criteria  cited  are  for  example  the  fact  that  human  body  material  intended  for autologous  or 
p.000015:  deferred  use  is  kept,  or  that  gametes  intended  for  partner  donation  are involved. 
p.000015:  9. The establishment must have written directives and procedures for controlling access to the premises, cleaning and 
p.000015:  maintenance, removal of waste and continuity of services in the event of an emergency. 
p.000015:   
p.000015:  E. Documentation and recording 
p.000015:  1.  A  system  characterised  by  clearly  defined  and  efficient  documentation,  proper  reporting and  registers, 
p.000015:  and  authorised  standard  operating  procedures  should  be  established  for  the procedures  for  which  approval 
p.000015:  is  requested.  Documents  must  be  regularly  revised  and compliant with the law and the present decree. The system 
p.000015:  must guarantee standardisation of the  procedures  performed  and  the  possibility  of  retracing  all  the  steps, 
p.000015:  that  is,  collection, codification,  donor  eligibility,  procurement,  processing,  preservation,  storage, 
p.000015:  transport, distribution or disposal or destruction, including aspects related to quality control and quality assurance. 
p.000015:  2. For any critical activity, the materials, equipment and personnel involved must be identified and documented. 
p.000015:  3.  Any  change  in  the  documents  must  be  checked,  dated,  approved,  documented  and executed without delay by 
p.000015:  authorised personnel in the establishments. 
...
Health / Physically Ill
Searching for indicator sick:
(return to top)
           
p.000004:  Reprod Biomed Online, 2005; 11(2):161. 
p.000004:  Hartshorne G.M., Challenge of the EU ‘tissues and cells’ directive. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 11: 404- 407. 
p.000004:  Mortimer  D.A.,  Critical  assessment  of  the  impact  of  the  European  Union  Tissues  and  Cells  Directive (2004) 
p.000004:  on  laboratory  practices  in  assisted  conception,  Reprod  Biomed  Online,  2005;  11(2):162-176. European  Society 
p.000004:  of  Human  Reproduction  and  Embryology  (ESHRE),  Statement  2009  on  the  European commission proposal of viral 
p.000004:  screening in assisted reproduction treatments (www.eshre.eu). Hughes C., Emerson  G.,  Grundy  K.,  Kelly  P.,  Mocanu 
p.000004:  E.,  Is  performing  viral  screening  within  30  days  of  oocyte collection justified?, Hum Reprod, 2010; 25:239. 
p.000004:  Janssens P.M., Rules and regulations in reproductive medicine: sensible requirements that should start with evidence, 
p.000004:  Hum Reprod. 2010; 25(12):3055-7. 2010. 
p.000004:  Wingfield M. et al., op. cit. 
p.000004:  18 Woolf S H., Harris R., The Harms of Screening, New Attention to an Old Concern, JAMA, 2012-Vol 307, No 6, p.565-566. 
p.000004:  19 N.B. We will not consider here examinations carried out with a view to treatment of the person himself (too-advanced 
p.000004:  preventive examinations) nor the harm caused by useless treatments (by the examination itself and also – this is not 
p.000004:  rare – through additional treatments that can lead to serious injuries). For this type  of  issue,  one  can  refer  to 
p.000004:  a  (more  general)  article  published  in  Lancet:  The  perils  of  excessive medical  care,  by  Shangavi  D.M., 
p.000004:  Lancet,  2011;  377,  1561-1562,  and  also  the  article  Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick  in the Pursuit  of 
p.000004:  Health,  M.D., 2011 by Welch H.G.G., Schwartz L.M., Woloshin S., which refers to the healthcare saga of Brian Mulroney, 
p.000004:  who was Prime Minister of Canada from 1984 to 1993. A preventive helicoidal scan of the thorax showed that he had two 
p.000004:  small nodules on the lung. A biopsy showed them to be completely benign. But the patient had to be hospitalised three 
p.000004:  months for this reason, and because of a complication due to the biopsy, developed life-threatening pancreatitis. 
p.000004:  20Serology does not allow the virus itself to be detected. As for all diseases, it only allows the traces of its 
p.000004:  passage to be detected, that is, the antibodies that are produced by the body in response to its “attack”. The 
p.000004:  antibodies produced are specific for each disease; a blood test detects only the antibodies for the disease 
p.000004:  that            it            is            supposed            to            detect            (see            notably 
p.000004:  http://www.3trois3.com/experience_pratique_du_sdrp/5-interets-des-differentes-techniques-d-analyses- 
p.000004:  :-serologie-pcr-s_606/;  Plantier  J.-C.  and  Simon  F.  (UHC  Charles  Nicolle  Virology  Laboratory,  Rouen), 
p.000004:  “Diagnostic sérologique des infections à VIH (Serological diagnosis of HIV infections)”, Développement et Santé, no. 
p.000004:  162, December 2002). 
p.000004:  21Royal Decree “quality and safety standards (2009)”, Art. 9 §2: “Donors of gametes, gonads, fragments of gonads, 
p.000004:  foetal human body material and embryos are subject to the biological tests specified in items 1, 2 and 3 of Annex IV 
...
Health / hospitalized patients
Searching for indicator hospitalised:
(return to top)
           
p.000004:  of  Human  Reproduction  and  Embryology  (ESHRE),  Statement  2009  on  the  European commission proposal of viral 
p.000004:  screening in assisted reproduction treatments (www.eshre.eu). Hughes C., Emerson  G.,  Grundy  K.,  Kelly  P.,  Mocanu 
p.000004:  E.,  Is  performing  viral  screening  within  30  days  of  oocyte collection justified?, Hum Reprod, 2010; 25:239. 
p.000004:  Janssens P.M., Rules and regulations in reproductive medicine: sensible requirements that should start with evidence, 
p.000004:  Hum Reprod. 2010; 25(12):3055-7. 2010. 
p.000004:  Wingfield M. et al., op. cit. 
p.000004:  18 Woolf S H., Harris R., The Harms of Screening, New Attention to an Old Concern, JAMA, 2012-Vol 307, No 6, p.565-566. 
p.000004:  19 N.B. We will not consider here examinations carried out with a view to treatment of the person himself (too-advanced 
p.000004:  preventive examinations) nor the harm caused by useless treatments (by the examination itself and also – this is not 
p.000004:  rare – through additional treatments that can lead to serious injuries). For this type  of  issue,  one  can  refer  to 
p.000004:  a  (more  general)  article  published  in  Lancet:  The  perils  of  excessive medical  care,  by  Shangavi  D.M., 
p.000004:  Lancet,  2011;  377,  1561-1562,  and  also  the  article  Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick  in the Pursuit  of 
p.000004:  Health,  M.D., 2011 by Welch H.G.G., Schwartz L.M., Woloshin S., which refers to the healthcare saga of Brian Mulroney, 
p.000004:  who was Prime Minister of Canada from 1984 to 1993. A preventive helicoidal scan of the thorax showed that he had two 
p.000004:  small nodules on the lung. A biopsy showed them to be completely benign. But the patient had to be hospitalised three 
p.000004:  months for this reason, and because of a complication due to the biopsy, developed life-threatening pancreatitis. 
p.000004:  20Serology does not allow the virus itself to be detected. As for all diseases, it only allows the traces of its 
p.000004:  passage to be detected, that is, the antibodies that are produced by the body in response to its “attack”. The 
p.000004:  antibodies produced are specific for each disease; a blood test detects only the antibodies for the disease 
p.000004:  that            it            is            supposed            to            detect            (see            notably 
p.000004:  http://www.3trois3.com/experience_pratique_du_sdrp/5-interets-des-differentes-techniques-d-analyses- 
p.000004:  :-serologie-pcr-s_606/;  Plantier  J.-C.  and  Simon  F.  (UHC  Charles  Nicolle  Virology  Laboratory,  Rouen), 
p.000004:  “Diagnostic sérologique des infections à VIH (Serological diagnosis of HIV infections)”, Développement et Santé, no. 
p.000004:  162, December 2002). 
p.000004:  21Royal Decree “quality and safety standards (2009)”, Art. 9 §2: “Donors of gametes, gonads, fragments of gonads, 
p.000004:  foetal human body material and embryos are subject to the biological tests specified in items 1, 2 and 3 of Annex IV 
p.000004:  (items 3.2 to 3.4, cf. text attached to this opinion). The biological tests specified in paragraph 1 are conducted 
p.000004:  according to the general provisions of item 4 in Annex IV.” 
p.000004:   
p.000004:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000005:  5 
p.000005:   
p.000005:  We note that item 4.2 of Annex IV of the Royal Decree “quality and safety standards (2009)” reads as follows: “Les 
p.000005:  échantillons de sang doivent être prélevés lors du don (Blood  samples  must  be  collected  at  donation)”,  while  in 
...
Social / Access to Social Goods
Searching for indicator access:
(return to top)
           
p.000015:  at  least  of  the  planned  use,  the  method  of application and the immune status of the recipient. Appropriate 
p.000015:  clothing, personal protective equipment and hygiene facilities, as  well as written instructions with regard to hygiene 
p.000015:  and apparel, must be provided in each section concerned within the establishment. 
p.000015:  6.  When  the  procedures  for  which  approval  is  requested  involve  storage  of  human  body material, the storage 
p.000015:  conditions necessary to preserve the required properties of the human body material, including key parameters such as 
p.000015:  temperature, humidity or air quality, should be specified. 
p.000015:  7.  Critical  parameters,  including  temperature,  humidity  or  air  quality,  must  be  controlled, monitored and 
p.000015:  recorded to prove their compliance with the required storage conditions. 
p.000015:  8. The storage premises must ensure clear separation and distinction between human body material before release and in 
p.000015:  quarantine, human body material that has been released and human  body  material  that  has  been  rejected,  in  order 
p.000015:  to  prevent  any  confusion  and  cross- contamination between them. In both quarantine areas and storage areas for 
p.000015:  released human body  materials, physically  separated areas  or  secure  storage  or  isolation  systems  are  to be 
p.000015:  provided for storing human body material fulfilling specific criteria. 
p.000015:  The  specific  criteria  cited  are  for  example  the  fact  that  human  body  material  intended  for autologous  or 
p.000015:  deferred  use  is  kept,  or  that  gametes  intended  for  partner  donation  are involved. 
p.000015:  9. The establishment must have written directives and procedures for controlling access to the premises, cleaning and 
p.000015:  maintenance, removal of waste and continuity of services in the event of an emergency. 
p.000015:   
p.000015:  E. Documentation and recording 
p.000015:  1.  A  system  characterised  by  clearly  defined  and  efficient  documentation,  proper  reporting and  registers, 
p.000015:  and  authorised  standard  operating  procedures  should  be  established  for  the procedures  for  which  approval 
p.000015:  is  requested.  Documents  must  be  regularly  revised  and compliant with the law and the present decree. The system 
p.000015:  must guarantee standardisation of the  procedures  performed  and  the  possibility  of  retracing  all  the  steps, 
p.000015:  that  is,  collection, codification,  donor  eligibility,  procurement,  processing,  preservation,  storage, 
p.000015:  transport, distribution or disposal or destruction, including aspects related to quality control and quality assurance. 
p.000015:  2. For any critical activity, the materials, equipment and personnel involved must be identified and documented. 
p.000015:  3.  Any  change  in  the  documents  must  be  checked,  dated,  approved,  documented  and executed without delay by 
p.000015:  authorised personnel in the establishments. 
p.000015:  4.  A  procedure  must  be  established  for  monitoring  documents  to  provide  the  history  of revisions  and 
p.000015:  changes  in  the  documents  and  to  guarantee  that  only  current  versions  of documents are used. 
p.000015:  5.  It  must  be  demonstrated  that  the  data  recorded  are  reliable  and  constitute  a  faithful representation 
p.000015:  of the results. 
p.000015:  6. The data recorded must be legible and indelible. They can be handwritten or recorded in another validated electronic 
p.000015:  system. 
p.000015:  7. Without prejudice to Article 6, §3, paragraph 2 of the present decree, all the data recorded, including basic data, 
p.000015:  that are critical for the safety and quality of the human body material must be preserved in such a way that access to 
p.000015:  these data is guaranteed for at least ten years after the expiry date for clinical use or disposal. 
p.000015:   
p.000015:   
p.000015:   
p.000015:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000016:  16 
p.000016:   
p.000016:  F. Evaluation of the quality 
p.000016:  1. An auditing system should be established for the activities for which approval is requested. Trained and competent 
p.000016:  persons must perform these audits independently, at least every two years,  in  order  to  ensure  that  the  approved 
p.000016:  protocols  and  regulatory  requirements  are observed. The results and corrective measures must be documented. 
p.000016:  2. Any breach in observance of the requirements provided by the quality and safety standards must  result  in 
p.000016:  documented  investigations,  along  with  a  decision  on  any  corrective  and preventive measures. The fate of 
p.000016:  non-compliant body material must be decided in accordance with the written procedures, under the supervision of the 
p.000016:  person responsible, and recorded. All  the  human  body  material  concerned  must  be  identified  and  undergo  the 
p.000016:  necessary measures. 
p.000016:  3.  Corrective  measures  must  be  documented,  implemented  and  completed  efficiently  and within appropriate time 
p.000016:  periods. The efficacy of the preventive and corrective measures should be evaluated after they are applied. 
p.000016:  4.   The   establishment   must   establish   procedures   allowing   the   efficacy   of   the   quality management 
p.000016:  system   to   be   evaluated   in   order   to   guarantee   systematic   and   ongoing improvement. 
p.000016:   
p.000016:  *** 
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
p.000016:   
...
Social / Age
Searching for indicator age:
(return to top)
           
p.000012:  - anti-HIV-1, 2 
p.000012:  - HBsAg 
p.000012:  - anti-HBc 
p.000012:  - anti-HCV 
p.000012:  - a syphilis screening test. 
p.000012:  In the case of sperm processed with a view to intrauterine insemination, not intended to be preserved, and if the 
p.000012:  establishment can demonstrate that the risk of cross-contamination and exposure of personnel has been taken into 
p.000012:  account through use of validated procedures, the biological tests are not necessarily performed. 
p.000012:  2.3. If the results of the tests for HIV 1 and 2, hepatitis B or C are positive or not available, or if  the  donor 
p.000012:  proves  to  be  a  source  of  infectious  risk,  a  separate  storage  system  must  be provided. 
p.000012:  2.4. Tests for HTLV-I antibodies must be performed in the case of donors living in areas with a high incidence  of this 
p.000012:  infection  or  originally  from these areas, or  whose sexual partners  or parents originate from these areas. 
p.000012:  2.5 In some circumstances, additional tests must be performed, depending on trips made by the donor, his exposure to 
p.000012:  risks, and the characteristics of the human body material donated (for example, RhD, malaria, CMV, T cruzi). 
p.000012:  2.6. Positive results do not necessarily rule out partner donation. 
p.000012:   
p.000012:  3. Donations other than partner donations. 
p.000012:  Aside from partner donations, use of gametes, embryos and gonads or fragments of gonads must fulfil the following 
p.000012:  criteria: 
p.000012:  3.1. Donors must be selected as a function of their age, their state of health and their medical histories,  on  the 
p.000012:  basis  of  a  questionnaire  and  an  interview  with  a  qualified  healthcare professional trained to this effect. 
p.000012:  This evaluation must involve all the pertinent factors that can contribute to identifying and excluding persons whose 
p.000012:  donation could be hazardous to the  health  of another, notably  the  possibility  of  transmitting  diseases 
p.000012:  (sexually  transmitted infections, for example), or to their own health (for example, superovulation, sedation, risks 
p.000012:  related to harvesting ova, or psychological consequences related to the donation). 
p.000012:  3.2. The HIV 1 and 2, HCV, and HBV tests and the syphilis test made on a serum or plasma sample  from  the  donor  in 
p.000012:  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  Annex  VI,  item  1.1,  must  be negative for donors. In addition, chlamydia 
p.000012:  tests made on a urine sample using the nucleic acid amplification technique must be negative for sperm donors. 
p.000012:  3.3.  The  HTLV-I  antibody  test  must  be  performed  for  donors  living  in  areas  with  a  high incidence of this 
p.000012:  infection or originally from such areas, or whose sexual partners or parents originate from these areas. 
p.000012:  3.4. In some circumstances, additional tests must be performed, depending on the history of the  donor  and  the 
p.000012:  characteristics  of  the  human  body  material  donated  (for  example,  RhD, malaria, CMV, T. cruzi). 
p.000012:  3.5. For autologous donors, the provisions of Annex II, item 2.1.1 are applicable. 
p.000012:  3.6. After consent to this effect has been granted: 
...
Social / Child
Searching for indicator child:
(return to top)
           
p.000007:  human body material.” 
p.000007:  28“Human body material (2008)” law. Traceability is defined there in Article 2, 23°, as “the ability to locate and 
p.000007:  identify the human body material at all steps of the process from procurement to distribution with a view  to  its  use 
p.000007:  or  destruction,  including  processing,  testing  and  storage.  This  involves  the  ability  to identify the donor 
p.000007:  and the structures or the production facility involved that receives, modifies or stores the human body material, and 
p.000007:  the ability to identify the recipients in hospitals that use the human body material.  This  also  involves  the 
p.000007:  ability  to  locate  and  identify  all  the  pertinent  data  concerning  the products and materials coming into 
p.000007:  contact with this human body material during the process.” 
p.000007:  29Art. 43 of the “human body material (2008)” law (Transitional provisions and effective date): “After the effective 
p.000007:  date of the present law (14 July 2010, under the terms of the law of 16 June 2009, Art. 46), human body material that 
p.000007:  was collected before this effective date and that is not  traceable cannot be used for human applications but can be 
p.000007:  used for purposes of scientific research.”; Art. 44: “Human body material collected before the effective date of the 
p.000007:  present law can be  used for human application after the effective date of this law insofar as the provisions of the 
p.000007:  present law, with the exception of Articles 10, 12, 20 and 21, are observed.” 
p.000007:   
p.000007:   
p.000007:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000008:  8 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  destruction is an option very difficult to defend; these gametes and embryos have in effect been entrusted by the 
p.000008:  patients with a view to later satisfying their desire for a child. 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  Recommendation 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  The  Committee  therefore  requests  that  the  regulations  be  amended.  Strict  regulations  can have a very 
p.000008:  positive effect in the future, but with regard to the past, only traceability of the origin of the gametes and embryos 
p.000008:  can be provided, not information on the use of solutions and material. 
p.000008:   
p.000008:   
p.000008:  III. Conclusions and recommendations 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  With this opinion, the Committee wishes to draw the attention of the competent authorities to the  ethical  problems 
p.000008:  raised  in  implementation  of  the  Belgian  law  “human  body  material (2008)”  and  its  implementing  decrees  by 
p.000008:  certain  provisions  applied  to  the  Centres  for medically assisted procreation. 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  1.   Article 6, §1, of the Royal Decree “quality and safety standards (2009)”, dealing with (1) the  guarantee  of 
p.000008:  traceability  of  all  human  body  material  (gametes  and  embryos) collected,  procured,  processed,  stored  or 
p.000008:  distributed,  goes  too  far  in  that  it  also involves (2) all the pertinent data on the products and materials 
p.000008:  coming into contact with this human body material. 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  Requirement  (1) poses  no problem;  (2) does, due  to the  fact  that  traceability  of the products  and  materials 
p.000008:  is  required  retroactively,  which  raises  a  significant  ethical problem. 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  2.   In the past, traceability of all these human body materials as well as the products and materials coming into 
p.000008:  contact with them has not been observed in practice. 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  3.   The consequence of this is that thousands of cryopreserved gametes and embryos can no longer serve the purposes 
...
           
p.000011:  b) or distribution with a view to another possible use as specified in a); 
p.000011:  c) the destruction of the human body material. 
p.000011:  Application of the preceding paragraph cannot have the consequence that the specified data are preserved for more than 
p.000011:  50 years. 
p.000011:  § 4. The data specified in §§2 and 3, paragraph 2, are kept in the procuring establishment immediately after 
p.000011:  collection. 
p.000011:  In the event of application of Article 8, §2, paragraph 3 of the law, the data specified in §§2 and 3 are preserved by 
p.000011:  the bank of human body material responsible, as specified in Article 8, 
p.000011:  §2, paragraph 4 of the law. 
p.000011:   
p.000011:  Annex IV 
p.000011:  Selection criteria and biological tests required for donors of gametes, embryos, gonads and fragments of gonads 
p.000011:  intended for assisted procreation 
p.000011:   
p.000011:  1. Partner donations for immediate use without storage or processing. 
p.000011:  The  donor  selection  criteria  and  laboratory  tests  do not  apply  in  the  case  of a  donation  of male gametes 
p.000011:  between partners for immediate use. 
p.000011:   
p.000011:  2. Partner donations other than for immediate use, as specified in item 1. 
p.000011:   
p.000011:   
p.000011:   
p.000011:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000012:  12 
p.000012:   
p.000012:  Gametes, gonads, fragments of gonads and  embryos that  are processed and/or stored and gametes  which  will  result 
p.000012:  in  embryos  that  will  be  cryopreserved  must  fulfil  the  following criteria: 
p.000012:  2.1.  The  treating  physician  of  the  donor  must  verify  and  document,  on  the  basis  of  the medical  history 
p.000012:  of  the  patient  and  the  therapeutic  indications,  the  justifications  for  the donation and the safety of the 
p.000012:  donation for the recipient and for any child that may be born from this donation. 
p.000012:  2.2.  The  following  biological  tests  must  be  performed  to  evaluate  the  risk  of  cross- contamination: 
p.000012:  - anti-HIV-1, 2 
p.000012:  - HBsAg 
p.000012:  - anti-HBc 
p.000012:  - anti-HCV 
p.000012:  - a syphilis screening test. 
p.000012:  In the case of sperm processed with a view to intrauterine insemination, not intended to be preserved, and if the 
p.000012:  establishment can demonstrate that the risk of cross-contamination and exposure of personnel has been taken into 
p.000012:  account through use of validated procedures, the biological tests are not necessarily performed. 
p.000012:  2.3. If the results of the tests for HIV 1 and 2, hepatitis B or C are positive or not available, or if  the  donor 
p.000012:  proves  to  be  a  source  of  infectious  risk,  a  separate  storage  system  must  be provided. 
p.000012:  2.4. Tests for HTLV-I antibodies must be performed in the case of donors living in areas with a high incidence  of this 
p.000012:  infection  or  originally  from these areas, or  whose sexual partners  or parents originate from these areas. 
p.000012:  2.5 In some circumstances, additional tests must be performed, depending on trips made by the donor, his exposure to 
p.000012:  risks, and the characteristics of the human body material donated (for example, RhD, malaria, CMV, T cruzi). 
p.000012:  2.6. Positive results do not necessarily rule out partner donation. 
p.000012:   
p.000012:  3. Donations other than partner donations. 
...
Social / Ethnicity
Searching for indicator ethnic:
(return to top)
           
p.000012:  basis  of  a  questionnaire  and  an  interview  with  a  qualified  healthcare professional trained to this effect. 
p.000012:  This evaluation must involve all the pertinent factors that can contribute to identifying and excluding persons whose 
p.000012:  donation could be hazardous to the  health  of another, notably  the  possibility  of  transmitting  diseases 
p.000012:  (sexually  transmitted infections, for example), or to their own health (for example, superovulation, sedation, risks 
p.000012:  related to harvesting ova, or psychological consequences related to the donation). 
p.000012:  3.2. The HIV 1 and 2, HCV, and HBV tests and the syphilis test made on a serum or plasma sample  from  the  donor  in 
p.000012:  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  Annex  VI,  item  1.1,  must  be negative for donors. In addition, chlamydia 
p.000012:  tests made on a urine sample using the nucleic acid amplification technique must be negative for sperm donors. 
p.000012:  3.3.  The  HTLV-I  antibody  test  must  be  performed  for  donors  living  in  areas  with  a  high incidence of this 
p.000012:  infection or originally from such areas, or whose sexual partners or parents originate from these areas. 
p.000012:  3.4. In some circumstances, additional tests must be performed, depending on the history of the  donor  and  the 
p.000012:  characteristics  of  the  human  body  material  donated  (for  example,  RhD, malaria, CMV, T. cruzi). 
p.000012:  3.5. For autologous donors, the provisions of Annex II, item 2.1.1 are applicable. 
p.000012:  3.6. After consent to this effect has been granted: 
p.000012:  a) genetic screening is performed for the autosomal recessive genes prevalent in the ethnic context of the donor, 
p.000012:  according to international scientific knowledge; 
p.000012:  b)  the  risk  of  transmission  of  hereditary  disorders  known  to  be  present  in  the  family  is evaluated. 
p.000012:  The  recipient  is  fully  and  intelligibly  informed  of  the  associated  risks  and  of the  measures taken to 
p.000012:  reduce them. 
p.000012:   
p.000012:   
p.000012:   
p.000012:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000013:  13 
p.000013:   
p.000013:  4. General conditions for determining biological markers. 
p.000013:  4.1. Tests must be performed in accordance with Annex VI, items 2.1 and 2.2. 
p.000013:  4.2. Blood samples must be collected at donation. 
p.000013:  4.3.  Donations  of  gametes,  embryos,  gonads  and  fragments  of  gonads  other  than  partner donations  or 
p.000013:  donations  of  gametes  intended  for  use  for  surplus  embryos  are  put  into quarantine for at least 180 days, a 
p.000013:  period at the end of which the tests must be recommenced. If the blood sample from the donor at the time of donation is 
p.000013:  also tested using the nucleic acid amplification technique (NAT) for HIV, HBV and HCV, it is not necessary to perform 
p.000013:  the tests on a second blood sample or to implement the quarantine specified above. Likewise, it is not  necessary  to 
p.000013:  recommence  the  test  when  the  processing  procedure  includes  a  validated inactivation step for the viruses 
p.000013:  concerned. 
p.000013:   
p.000013:  Annex VII 
p.000013:  Various provisions on the quality and safety of activities in the establishments 
p.000013:   
p.000013:  A. Organisation and management 
p.000013:  1. A manager of human body material should be designated, equipped with the qualifications specified in the law as 
...
Social / Incarcerated
Searching for indicator restricted:
(return to top)
           
p.000006:  Sep;23(3):341-6 (an abstract of which is available on the site  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21767989). 
p.000006:  Cobo  A.,  Meseguer  M.,  Remohí  J.,  Pellicer  A.,  Use  of  cryo-banked  oocytes  in  an  ovum  donation programme: 
p.000006:  a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial, Hum Reprod. 2010 Sep; 25(9):2239-46. Epub  2010  Jun  30. 
p.000006:  Source:  Instituto  Valenciano  de  Infertilidad  (IVI),  University  of  Valencia,  Valencia, Spain. (an abstract of 
p.000006:  which is available on the site http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20591872). 
p.000006:  See also Herrero L., Pareja S., Losada C., Cobo A., Pellicer A., Garcia-Velasco J.A., Avoiding the  use of human 
p.000006:  chorionic  gonadotropin combined  with oocyte vitrification and  GnRH  agonist  triggering versus coasting: a new 
p.000006:  strategy to avoid ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, 2011 Mar 1;95(3):1137-40. Epub 2010 Nov 3. 
p.000006:  Mertes H., Pennings G., Social egg freezing: for better, not for worse, Reproductive BioMedicine Online (2011) 23, 
p.000006:  824-829. 
p.000006:  26In accordance with the general provisions of item 4 of Annex IV of the Royal Decree “quality and safety standards 
p.000006:  (2009)”. 
p.000006:   
p.000006:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000007:  7 
p.000007:   
p.000007:  Recommendations 
p.000007:   
p.000007:  A/  It  would  be  preferable  that  these  tests  rely  on  the  same  principles  as  those applicable to 
p.000007:  heterologous sperm donation. 
p.000007:  Here as well, it seems desirable that a virological test performed 14 days to 3 weeks maximum before the collection 
p.000007:  procedure be the rule. This would offer greater safety than the provision specifying that the PCR be performed at the 
p.000007:  time of collection, as 72 hours generally pass before the result is known. Given the restricted time interval and the 
p.000007:  impossibility  of  always  organising  a  quarantine,  an  additional  possibility  must obviously be provided for 
p.000007:  conducting the PCR if the oocytes must be used in the short term. 
p.000007:   
p.000007:  B/ It would be preferable that the quarantine period also be observed in the case of freezing (vitrification) (as for 
p.000007:  sperm donation). 
p.000007:   
p.000007:  3.  The traceability requirement27 
p.000007:   
p.000007:  A requirement of complete traceability of gametes and embryos is justified and can certainly be satisfied. In addition 
p.000007:  to this condition, the new regulations have also introduced that  of traceability  for all solutions and equipment 
p.000007:  used28. This provides that each sample must  be accompanied   by   extensive   methodological   traceability   (in 
p.000007:  other   words,   by   any   useful information  in  connection  with  the  products,  materials  and  equipment  used 
p.000007:  for  processing and preservation). 
p.000007:   
p.000007:  The Committee entirely approves of this traceability requirement, to be applied at once and in the future. This can 
p.000007:  only increase the safety  of the procedures and the commitment  of the staff involved. 
p.000007:   
p.000007:  However, the new regulations also require that the same provisions be observed with regard to gametes and embryos 
p.000007:  collected in the past. Serious ethical objections are however raised. 
p.000007:   
p.000007:  A/ First of all, it is not admissible – at least for this type of provision  – to introduce retroactive regulations29. 
p.000007:   
p.000007:  B/ Given that the centres cannot  fully  observe these requirements, these regulations can  have  the  effect  that 
p.000007:  they  are  obliged  to  destroy  thousands  of  cryopreserved embryos and gametes. These embryos and gametes can in 
...
Social / Occupation
Searching for indicator job:
(return to top)
           
p.000013:  5. It should be ensured that the risks inherent in use and handing of human body material are identified  and  reduced 
p.000013:  insofar  as  possible,  while  maintaining  a  level  of  quality  and  safety appropriate for the use for which the 
p.000013:  human body material is intended. These risks include notably those related to procedures, the environment and the state 
p.000013:  of health of the personnel within the establishment in question. 
p.000013:  6.  Agreements  concluded  between  establishments  and  third  parties  must  comply  with  the provisions  of the 
p.000013:  law and  of the  present  decree.  Agreements  made  with  third  parties  must specify the methods of collaboration 
p.000013:  and the responsibilities, as well as the protocols to be followed to fulfil the required performance demands. 
p.000013:  7.  A  standard  operating  procedure  must  exist,  supervised  by  the  manager  of  human  body material  and 
p.000013:  serving  to  confirm  that  the  human   body  material  satisfies  the  required specifications with regard to safety 
p.000013:  and quality, for its release and distribution. 
p.000013:  8.  In  the  event  of  cessation  of  activities,  the  agreements  concluded  and  the  procedures adopted in 
p.000013:  compliance with the law include traceability data and information on the quality and safety of the human body material. 
p.000013:  9. A standard operating procedure exists guaranteeing identification of each unit of human body material at all steps 
p.000013:  of the procedures. 
p.000013:   
p.000013:  B. Personnel 
p.000013:  1.  The  personnel  of  the  establishments  must  be  available  in  sufficient  number  and  be qualified for the 
p.000013:  tasks to be performed. The competence of the personnel must be evaluated at appropriate intervals specified in the 
p.000013:  quality system. 
p.000013:  2. Clear job descriptions, documented and updated, must exist for all members of personnel. Their tasks, functions and 
p.000013:  responsibility must be clearly documented and well-understood. 
p.000013:  3.  The  personnel  must  receive  basic  training  and  refresher  training  when  a  change  in procedures  or  a 
p.000013:  development  in  scientific  knowledge  requires  it,  and  be  given  appropriate opportunities  for  professional 
p.000013:  development  in  the  area  involved.  The  training  programme ensures and provides documented proof that each 
p.000013:  individual: 
p.000013:  a) has proven his competence in performing the tasks assigned to him; 
p.000013:   
p.000013:   
p.000013:   
p.000013:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000014:  14 
p.000014:   
p.000014:  b) has adequate knowledge and comprehension of the principles and/or the scientific and/or technical processes that are 
p.000014:  important for the tasks allotted to him; 
p.000014:  c)  understands  the  organisational  framework,  the  quality  system and  the  health  and  safety rules of the 
p.000014:  establishment in which he works; 
p.000014:  d) is duly informed of the broader ethical, legal and regulatory context involved in his work. 
p.000014:   
p.000014:  C. Equipment and materials 
p.000014:  1. All equipment and materials must be designed and maintained in such a way that they are suitable for the use for 
p.000014:  which they are intended, and must reduce insofar as possible any risk for the recipients and the personnel. 
p.000014:  2. All critical equipment and technical devices must be identified and validated, and undergo regular  inspections  and 
p.000014:  preventive  maintenance  in  accordance  with  the  manufacturer’s instructions.   When   the   equipment   or 
p.000014:  materials   involve   critical   processing   or   storage parameters  (for  example, temperature, pressure, particle 
...
Social / Trade Union Membership
Searching for indicator union:
(return to top)
           
p.000002:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000003:  3 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  or sperm in the two partners of a couple in the context of a medically assisted procreation procedure, in the case of 
p.000003:  other than immediate use. This high frequency is very difficult to defend and hardly feasible in practice: 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  A/ The risk of exogenous contamination by diseases during treatment is very low. This is moreover confirmed in 
p.000003:  international studies10. 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  B/ Systematic monitoring in order to protect the laboratory personnel is meaningless, given  that  the  entire 
p.000003:  procedure  must  take  place  in  a  completely  sterile  environment where the personnel must always observe standard 
p.000003:  sterility precautions11. 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  C/  Systematic  monitoring  and  repeated  performance  of  blood  analyses  at  each donation generate a resulting 
p.000003:  additional cost for the community. The  additional cost for INAMI12  in Belgium is approximately 4.8 million euro13. 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  D/  Given  that  at  present  no contamination  has  been  reported in  major  international studies14,  the 
p.000003:  investment  of  such  a  significant  sum  of  public  money  for  such  a  low benefit is difficult to justify from an 
p.000003:  ethical point of view. 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  E/  Physical  and  psychological  pressure  is  also  added  to  the  financial  factor,  as  the patients  must 
p.000003:  submit  to  blood  sampling  and  appear  each  time  for  a  series  of procedures. 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  F/ A recent study by the Belgian Society of Reproductive Medicine (BSRM)15   has shown that various intervals between 
p.000003:  virological tests are assigned in the various countries of the  European  Union.  They  are  as  follows:  Norway  12 
p.000003:  months,  Denmark  24  months, Finland and Sweden 12 to 24 months, Poland 6 months, France less than 6 months for the 
p.000003:  first cycle and then every 24 months. In Germany, examinations must take place one  week  before  oocyte  collection. 
p.000003:  In  Italy,  the  period  is  3  months;  in  Greece, screening  is  advised  before  the  first  sperm  donation  and 
p.000003:  after  three  to  four  cycles. Finally, in Latvia, a check is required every 6 months. 
p.000003:  Moreover,  a  European  bill  exists  to  limit  repetition  of  testing  to  one  test  every  24 months16. 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  Recommendation 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  In the light of these aspects and on the basis of the information collected on the international scale,  it  is 
p.000003:  proposed  that  virological  analysis  for  HIV,  hepatitis  B  and  C  and  syphilis  be performed  only  at  the 
p.000003:  first  procedure  and  conducted  afterward  only  at  12-month  intervals. 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  10     Wingfield  M.,  Cottell  E.,   Viral  screening  of  couples   undergoing  partner  donation   in  assisted 
p.000003:  reproduction  with  regard  to  EU  Directives  2004/23/EC,  2006/17/EC  and  2006/86/EC:  what  is  the evidence  for 
p.000003:  repeated  screening?  E.  Hum  Reprod.  2010;  25(12):3058-65.  Pepas  L.,  Macmahon  E.,  El Toukhy T., Khalaf Y. & 
p.000003:  Braude P., Viral screening before each cycle of assisted conception treatment is expensive  and  unnecessary:  a 
p.000003:  survey  of  results  from  a  UK  inner  city  clinic ,  Human  Fertility,  2011; 14(4):224-229. 
p.000003:  11  See Annex VII of the aforementioned Royal Decree “quality and safety standards (2009)” (text attached in the 
p.000003:  Appendix). 
...
           
p.000003:  systems, which does not affect the safety and quality of reproductive cells and/or human health when donors are tested 
p.000003:  at up to 24 months time intervals”. 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000004:  4 
p.000004:   
p.000004:  This  would  correspond  to  the  international  consensus  published  in  a  number  of  scientific publications17. 
p.000004:   
p.000004:  With this adaptation, a balance can be reached between greater safety on the one hand and costs and burdens on the 
p.000004:  donor/partner on the other hand. In this regard, reference can  be made  to  an  article  from  the  American  Medical 
p.000004:  Association:  The  Harms  of  Screening,  New Attention to an Old Concern 18. 
p.000004:   
p.000004:  In  a  discussion  of  preventive  diagnostic  examinations,  false  positive  results  can  never  be forgotten, nor 
p.000004:  the burden of additional examinations. In this context, it should also be noted that these useless additional 
p.000004:  examinations sometimes represent a high cost to the community and thus uselessly squander the scant resources essential 
p.000004:  to the curative sector19. 
p.000004:   
p.000004:   
p.000004:  2.   Sperm  and  oocyte  donation,  fresh  or  after  cryopreservation,  other  than  partner donation 
p.000004:   
p.000004:  2. 1. Virological analyses required for sperm donation other partner donation 
p.000004:   
p.000004:  2.1.1. Technical data 
p.000004:   
p.000004:  Current  regulations  require  virological  testing20    at  least  for  HIV,  hepatitis  B  and  C, syphilis  and 
p.000004:  chlamydia  (by  PCR  =  NAT  test  or  not)  at  each  consecutive  donation  of sperm by the same donor21. 
p.000004:   
p.000004:  17  Bhargava P.M., On the critical assessment of the impact of the recent European Union Tissues and Cells Directive. 
p.000004:  Reprod Biomed Online, 2005; 11(2):161. 
p.000004:  Hartshorne G.M., Challenge of the EU ‘tissues and cells’ directive. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 11: 404- 407. 
p.000004:  Mortimer  D.A.,  Critical  assessment  of  the  impact  of  the  European  Union  Tissues  and  Cells  Directive (2004) 
p.000004:  on  laboratory  practices  in  assisted  conception,  Reprod  Biomed  Online,  2005;  11(2):162-176. European  Society 
p.000004:  of  Human  Reproduction  and  Embryology  (ESHRE),  Statement  2009  on  the  European commission proposal of viral 
p.000004:  screening in assisted reproduction treatments (www.eshre.eu). Hughes C., Emerson  G.,  Grundy  K.,  Kelly  P.,  Mocanu 
p.000004:  E.,  Is  performing  viral  screening  within  30  days  of  oocyte collection justified?, Hum Reprod, 2010; 25:239. 
p.000004:  Janssens P.M., Rules and regulations in reproductive medicine: sensible requirements that should start with evidence, 
p.000004:  Hum Reprod. 2010; 25(12):3055-7. 2010. 
p.000004:  Wingfield M. et al., op. cit. 
p.000004:  18 Woolf S H., Harris R., The Harms of Screening, New Attention to an Old Concern, JAMA, 2012-Vol 307, No 6, p.565-566. 
p.000004:  19 N.B. We will not consider here examinations carried out with a view to treatment of the person himself (too-advanced 
p.000004:  preventive examinations) nor the harm caused by useless treatments (by the examination itself and also – this is not 
p.000004:  rare – through additional treatments that can lead to serious injuries). For this type  of  issue,  one  can  refer  to 
p.000004:  a  (more  general)  article  published  in  Lancet:  The  perils  of  excessive medical  care,  by  Shangavi  D.M., 
p.000004:  Lancet,  2011;  377,  1561-1562,  and  also  the  article  Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick  in the Pursuit  of 
p.000004:  Health,  M.D., 2011 by Welch H.G.G., Schwartz L.M., Woloshin S., which refers to the healthcare saga of Brian Mulroney, 
p.000004:  who was Prime Minister of Canada from 1984 to 1993. A preventive helicoidal scan of the thorax showed that he had two 
...
Social / embryo
Searching for indicator embryo:
(return to top)
           
p.000002:  centres 
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:  11)  Directive  2004/23/EC  of  the  European  Parliament  and  the  Council  of  31  March  2004  on  setting 
p.000002:  standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and 
p.000002:  distribution of human tissues and cells; 2) Directive 2006/17/EC of the Commission of 8 February 2006 implementing 
p.000002:  directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and the Council as regards certain technical  requirements  for  the 
p.000002:  donation,  procurement  and  testing  of  human  tissues  and  cells;  3) Directive 2006/86/EC of the Commission of 24 
p.000002:  October 2006 implementing Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and the Council as regards traceability 
p.000002:  requirements, notification of serious adverse reactions  and  events,  and  certain  technical  requirements  for  the 
p.000002:  coding,  processing,  preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells. 
p.000002:  2See in particular opinion no. 11 of the  Committee of 20 December 1999 on collection of organs and tissues from 
p.000002:  healthy living subjects with a view to transplantation, opinion of the Committee no. 42 of 16 April 2007 on umbilical 
p.000002:  cord blood banks and opinion of the Committee no. 50 of 9 May 2011 on certain ethical aspects of the amendments made by 
p.000002:  the law of 25 February 2007 to the law of 13 June 1986 on organ collection and transplantation. 
p.000002:  3See opinion of the Committee no. 18 of 16 September 2002 on research on the human embryo in vitro. 4Royal  Decree  of 
p.000002:  28  September  2009  setting  quality  and  safety  standards  for  donation,  collection, procurement, testing, 
p.000002:  processing, storage and distribution of human bodily material, with which banks of   human   bodily   material, 
p.000002:  intermediate   structures   for   human   bodily   material   and   production establishments  must  comply,  hereafter 
p.000002:  designated  as the  Royal  Decree  “quality  and  safety  standards (2009)”, in particular Annex IV. 
p.000002:  5Law of 6 July 2007 on medically assisted procreation and destination of excess embryos and gametes, hereafter 
p.000002:  designated “MAP (2007)” law. 
p.000002:   
p.000002:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000002:  2 
p.000002:   
p.000002:  concerned. From an ethical point  of view, the opinions are based on the  model  of the  four traditional  principles 
p.000002:  of  medical  ethics.  Analysis  of  the  regulations  shows  that  in  several provisions, it contradicts these 
p.000002:  principles. 
p.000002:  Thus, it is difficult to defend a position stipulating that in the event of manifest shortage of means,   these 
p.000002:  valuable   resources   will   be   devoted   to   performing   less   useful   technical examinations. The same 
p.000002:  reasoning also applies when the examinations to be performed prove to be detrimental to the persons examined. 
p.000002:   
p.000002:  II. Analysis 
p.000002:   
p.000002:  Interviews with some experts6  have revealed certain concerns, specified below, with regard to both  donations  between 
p.000002:  partners  other  than  for  immediate  use  and  donations  other  than those between partners. 
p.000002:   
p.000002:  The ethical analysis is based on the four principles of biomedical ethics7. We have considered whether the new 
...
Social / parents
Searching for indicator parents:
(return to top)
           
p.000012:  in  embryos  that  will  be  cryopreserved  must  fulfil  the  following criteria: 
p.000012:  2.1.  The  treating  physician  of  the  donor  must  verify  and  document,  on  the  basis  of  the medical  history 
p.000012:  of  the  patient  and  the  therapeutic  indications,  the  justifications  for  the donation and the safety of the 
p.000012:  donation for the recipient and for any child that may be born from this donation. 
p.000012:  2.2.  The  following  biological  tests  must  be  performed  to  evaluate  the  risk  of  cross- contamination: 
p.000012:  - anti-HIV-1, 2 
p.000012:  - HBsAg 
p.000012:  - anti-HBc 
p.000012:  - anti-HCV 
p.000012:  - a syphilis screening test. 
p.000012:  In the case of sperm processed with a view to intrauterine insemination, not intended to be preserved, and if the 
p.000012:  establishment can demonstrate that the risk of cross-contamination and exposure of personnel has been taken into 
p.000012:  account through use of validated procedures, the biological tests are not necessarily performed. 
p.000012:  2.3. If the results of the tests for HIV 1 and 2, hepatitis B or C are positive or not available, or if  the  donor 
p.000012:  proves  to  be  a  source  of  infectious  risk,  a  separate  storage  system  must  be provided. 
p.000012:  2.4. Tests for HTLV-I antibodies must be performed in the case of donors living in areas with a high incidence  of this 
p.000012:  infection  or  originally  from these areas, or  whose sexual partners  or parents originate from these areas. 
p.000012:  2.5 In some circumstances, additional tests must be performed, depending on trips made by the donor, his exposure to 
p.000012:  risks, and the characteristics of the human body material donated (for example, RhD, malaria, CMV, T cruzi). 
p.000012:  2.6. Positive results do not necessarily rule out partner donation. 
p.000012:   
p.000012:  3. Donations other than partner donations. 
p.000012:  Aside from partner donations, use of gametes, embryos and gonads or fragments of gonads must fulfil the following 
p.000012:  criteria: 
p.000012:  3.1. Donors must be selected as a function of their age, their state of health and their medical histories,  on  the 
p.000012:  basis  of  a  questionnaire  and  an  interview  with  a  qualified  healthcare professional trained to this effect. 
p.000012:  This evaluation must involve all the pertinent factors that can contribute to identifying and excluding persons whose 
p.000012:  donation could be hazardous to the  health  of another, notably  the  possibility  of  transmitting  diseases 
p.000012:  (sexually  transmitted infections, for example), or to their own health (for example, superovulation, sedation, risks 
p.000012:  related to harvesting ova, or psychological consequences related to the donation). 
p.000012:  3.2. The HIV 1 and 2, HCV, and HBV tests and the syphilis test made on a serum or plasma sample  from  the  donor  in 
p.000012:  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  Annex  VI,  item  1.1,  must  be negative for donors. In addition, chlamydia 
p.000012:  tests made on a urine sample using the nucleic acid amplification technique must be negative for sperm donors. 
p.000012:  3.3.  The  HTLV-I  antibody  test  must  be  performed  for  donors  living  in  areas  with  a  high incidence of this 
p.000012:  infection or originally from such areas, or whose sexual partners or parents originate from these areas. 
p.000012:  3.4. In some circumstances, additional tests must be performed, depending on the history of the  donor  and  the 
p.000012:  characteristics  of  the  human  body  material  donated  (for  example,  RhD, malaria, CMV, T. cruzi). 
p.000012:  3.5. For autologous donors, the provisions of Annex II, item 2.1.1 are applicable. 
p.000012:  3.6. After consent to this effect has been granted: 
p.000012:  a) genetic screening is performed for the autosomal recessive genes prevalent in the ethnic context of the donor, 
p.000012:  according to international scientific knowledge; 
p.000012:  b)  the  risk  of  transmission  of  hereditary  disorders  known  to  be  present  in  the  family  is evaluated. 
p.000012:  The  recipient  is  fully  and  intelligibly  informed  of  the  associated  risks  and  of the  measures taken to 
p.000012:  reduce them. 
p.000012:   
p.000012:   
p.000012:   
p.000012:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000013:  13 
p.000013:   
p.000013:  4. General conditions for determining biological markers. 
p.000013:  4.1. Tests must be performed in accordance with Annex VI, items 2.1 and 2.2. 
p.000013:  4.2. Blood samples must be collected at donation. 
p.000013:  4.3.  Donations  of  gametes,  embryos,  gonads  and  fragments  of  gonads  other  than  partner donations  or 
p.000013:  donations  of  gametes  intended  for  use  for  surplus  embryos  are  put  into quarantine for at least 180 days, a 
p.000013:  period at the end of which the tests must be recommenced. If the blood sample from the donor at the time of donation is 
...
Social / philosophical differences/differences of opinion
Searching for indicator opinion:
(return to top)
           
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:  Opinion no. 52 of 12 March 2012 on the ethical aspects of certain provisions of the  European  and  Belgian 
p.000002:  regulations with regard to human tissues and cells used   in   the   context   of   reproductive medicine 
p.000002:   
p.000002:  Referral 
p.000002:  The question submitted to the “Ethics and regulation in reproductive medicine” commission was formulated on the 
p.000002:  initiative of the Bureau of the Advisory Committee on Bioethics itself on 26 February 2010. 
p.000002:  More precisely, it concerns the issue of whether, as an ethical consideration, the new Belgian regulations following 
p.000002:  transposition of certain provisions of the European directives on human tissues  and  cells1   include  features  that 
p.000002:  make  the  application  of  good  clinical  practices  and principles of medical ethics more difficult with regard to 
p.000002:  medically assisted procreation. 
p.000002:   
p.000002:  The  Committee  decided  in  its  plenary  session  of  8  March  2010  to  take  this  question  into consideration 
p.000002:  and  entrusted  the  2010/4  commission  with  examining  it.  In  the  light  of this examination, the Committee has 
p.000002:  then carried out its own evaluation of the regulations. 
p.000002:  This evaluation emphasises the Belgian situation, which has  been  compared successively to international  consensus 
p.000002:  (via  the  experts  consulted)  and  needs  in  the  field  (practitioners  in Belgium). 
p.000002:   
p.000002:  I.    Preamble 
p.000002:  This opinion will not deal with issues covered by opinions previously issued by the Committee on the ethical problems 
p.000002:  raised by collections of human body material intended for academic research or used for commercial purposes, or by 
p.000002:  banks of organs, cells or tissues constituted with  a  view  to  autologous  or  heterologous  transplantation  for 
p.000002:  therapeutic  purposes,  or  by banks of blood or its constituents for therapeutic purposes2. This opinion will also not 
p.000002:  deal with the use of gametes or embryos for purposes of scientific research3. It will concentrate on certain  specific 
p.000002:  factors  that  hinder  good  clinical  practice  in  centres  for  medically  assisted reproduction (called “MAP 
p.000002:  Centres”). 
p.000002:   
p.000002:  These centres are responsible for the use of gametes or reproductive tissues with a view to medically assisted 
p.000002:  procreation and in this capacity must apply the Belgian regulations in this regard, in particular the Royal Decree of 
p.000002:  28 September 2009 concerning banks of human body material4. This is combined with the legislation on  medically 
p.000002:  assisted procreation (MAP) and that on obtaining and using human body material5, which must also be applied in the 
p.000002:  centres 
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:  11)  Directive  2004/23/EC  of  the  European  Parliament  and  the  Council  of  31  March  2004  on  setting 
p.000002:  standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and 
p.000002:  distribution of human tissues and cells; 2) Directive 2006/17/EC of the Commission of 8 February 2006 implementing 
p.000002:  directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and the Council as regards certain technical  requirements  for  the 
p.000002:  donation,  procurement  and  testing  of  human  tissues  and  cells;  3) Directive 2006/86/EC of the Commission of 24 
p.000002:  October 2006 implementing Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and the Council as regards traceability 
p.000002:  requirements, notification of serious adverse reactions  and  events,  and  certain  technical  requirements  for  the 
p.000002:  coding,  processing,  preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells. 
p.000002:  2See in particular opinion no. 11 of the  Committee of 20 December 1999 on collection of organs and tissues from 
p.000002:  healthy living subjects with a view to transplantation, opinion of the Committee no. 42 of 16 April 2007 on umbilical 
p.000002:  cord blood banks and opinion of the Committee no. 50 of 9 May 2011 on certain ethical aspects of the amendments made by 
p.000002:  the law of 25 February 2007 to the law of 13 June 1986 on organ collection and transplantation. 
p.000002:  3See opinion of the Committee no. 18 of 16 September 2002 on research on the human embryo in vitro. 4Royal  Decree  of 
p.000002:  28  September  2009  setting  quality  and  safety  standards  for  donation,  collection, procurement, testing, 
p.000002:  processing, storage and distribution of human bodily material, with which banks of   human   bodily   material, 
p.000002:  intermediate   structures   for   human   bodily   material   and   production establishments  must  comply,  hereafter 
p.000002:  designated  as the  Royal  Decree  “quality  and  safety  standards (2009)”, in particular Annex IV. 
p.000002:  5Law of 6 July 2007 on medically assisted procreation and destination of excess embryos and gametes, hereafter 
p.000002:  designated “MAP (2007)” law. 
p.000002:   
p.000002:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000002:  2 
p.000002:   
p.000002:  concerned. From an ethical point  of view, the opinions are based on the  model  of the  four traditional  principles 
p.000002:  of  medical  ethics.  Analysis  of  the  regulations  shows  that  in  several provisions, it contradicts these 
p.000002:  principles. 
p.000002:  Thus, it is difficult to defend a position stipulating that in the event of manifest shortage of means,   these 
p.000002:  valuable   resources   will   be   devoted   to   performing   less   useful   technical examinations. The same 
p.000002:  reasoning also applies when the examinations to be performed prove to be detrimental to the persons examined. 
p.000002:   
p.000002:  II. Analysis 
p.000002:   
p.000002:  Interviews with some experts6  have revealed certain concerns, specified below, with regard to both  donations  between 
p.000002:  partners  other  than  for  immediate  use  and  donations  other  than those between partners. 
p.000002:   
...
           
p.000002:  The second principle is that of non-maleficence. A medical procedure that causes harm must be justified by a) a 
p.000002:  relative advantage compared to the application of another ethical principle; 
p.000002:  b) the certainty of preventing greater harm. Harm to the donor (testing, sampling) is justified by the concern for 
p.000002:  preventing harm (contamination) to the recipient. If it is obvious that the tests do not protect against any 
p.000002:  contamination or if another procedure can achieve the same result by causing less harm, then there is cause to amend 
p.000002:  the regulations as a consequence. 
p.000002:   
p.000002:   
p.000002:  1.   Donation between partners other than for immediate use 
p.000002:   
p.000002:  Is it necessary to conduct blood tests repeated at each collection of gametes in couples treated, even if sperm and 
p.000002:  autologous oocytes of the couple in treatment are used8? 
p.000002:   
p.000002:  According to the present regulations, virological analysis for HIV, hepatitis B and C (HBV and HCV) and syphilis is 
p.000002:  required (with or without PCR/NAT9) at each procedure involving oocytes 
p.000002:   
p.000002:  Law of 19 December 2008 on procurement and use of human body material intended for human medical applications  or  for 
p.000002:  purposes  of  scientific  research, hereafter  designated  as  the  “human body  material (2008)” law. 
p.000002:  6  Cited on the last page of this opinion. 
p.000002:  7   Beauchamp T.L., Childress J.F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Oxford University Press, 6th ed., 2008 (French 
p.000002:  translation Les principes de l'éthique biomédicale, Paris, Les Belles Lettres, Médecine & Sciences humaines, 2008). 
p.000002:  8   See Art. 4.2. of  Annex IV  of the  Royal Decree  “quality and safety standards (2009)”:  “Blood samples must be 
p.000002:  collected upon donation” (“general conditions for determining biological markers”) and Articles 
p.000002:  2.1. to 2.6.; see also Art. 4.2. of Annex III of the aforementioned directive of 8 February 2006. 
p.000002:  9PCR  (polymerase  chain  reaction)  designates  a  modern  technique  for  DNA  analysis  lending  itself  to 
p.000002:  automation  and  using  the  molecular  biology  of  in  vitro  DNA  amplification.  Polymerase  or  reverse 
p.000002:  transcriptase is an enzyme associated with carcinogenic viruses, those of some leukaemias and that of AIDS (HIV), and 
p.000002:  allows this RNA virus to incorporate itself into the chromosomes of the cell it infects and that are made of DNA. PCR 
p.000002:  allows for example a bacterium or virus to be identified or a gene mutation to be revealed to diagnose a genetic 
p.000002:  disease  (Dictionnaire Garnier-Delamare des termes de médecine, Paris, Maloine, 30th   ed., 2009, see  "gene 
p.000002:  amplification" and  "reverse transcriptase").  The  Royal Decree uses NAT (Nucleic Acid Amplification Technology), 
p.000002:  which designates the same technique for nucleic acid amplification, instead of PCR. 
p.000002:   
p.000002:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000003:  3 
p.000003:   
p.000003:  or sperm in the two partners of a couple in the context of a medically assisted procreation procedure, in the case of 
...
           
p.000004:  Health,  M.D., 2011 by Welch H.G.G., Schwartz L.M., Woloshin S., which refers to the healthcare saga of Brian Mulroney, 
p.000004:  who was Prime Minister of Canada from 1984 to 1993. A preventive helicoidal scan of the thorax showed that he had two 
p.000004:  small nodules on the lung. A biopsy showed them to be completely benign. But the patient had to be hospitalised three 
p.000004:  months for this reason, and because of a complication due to the biopsy, developed life-threatening pancreatitis. 
p.000004:  20Serology does not allow the virus itself to be detected. As for all diseases, it only allows the traces of its 
p.000004:  passage to be detected, that is, the antibodies that are produced by the body in response to its “attack”. The 
p.000004:  antibodies produced are specific for each disease; a blood test detects only the antibodies for the disease 
p.000004:  that            it            is            supposed            to            detect            (see            notably 
p.000004:  http://www.3trois3.com/experience_pratique_du_sdrp/5-interets-des-differentes-techniques-d-analyses- 
p.000004:  :-serologie-pcr-s_606/;  Plantier  J.-C.  and  Simon  F.  (UHC  Charles  Nicolle  Virology  Laboratory,  Rouen), 
p.000004:  “Diagnostic sérologique des infections à VIH (Serological diagnosis of HIV infections)”, Développement et Santé, no. 
p.000004:  162, December 2002). 
p.000004:  21Royal Decree “quality and safety standards (2009)”, Art. 9 §2: “Donors of gametes, gonads, fragments of gonads, 
p.000004:  foetal human body material and embryos are subject to the biological tests specified in items 1, 2 and 3 of Annex IV 
p.000004:  (items 3.2 to 3.4, cf. text attached to this opinion). The biological tests specified in paragraph 1 are conducted 
p.000004:  according to the general provisions of item 4 in Annex IV.” 
p.000004:   
p.000004:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000005:  5 
p.000005:   
p.000005:  We note that item 4.2 of Annex IV of the Royal Decree “quality and safety standards (2009)” reads as follows: “Les 
p.000005:  échantillons de sang doivent être prélevés lors du don (Blood  samples  must  be  collected  at  donation)”,  while  in 
p.000005:  the  corresponding  Dutch version   we  read:   4.2.  “Bloedmonsters  worden   op  het  tijdstip  van  de   donation 
p.000005:  afgenomen (Blood samples are collected at the time of donation)”. This difference in translation gives rise to a 
p.000005:  divergence in interpretation. 
p.000005:   
p.000005:  These  sperm  donations  generally  take  place  twice  per  week,  with  repetition  of  the aforementioned tests each 
p.000005:  time, while the sperm is frozen each time. The reliability of the  result  of  the  PCR  conducted  immediately  after 
p.000005:  contamination  (in  acute  cases)  is inadequate in this respect. 
p.000005:   
p.000005:  2.1.2. Precautions to be observed 
p.000005:   
p.000005:  A  quarantine  of  a  minimum  of  180  days  after  the  last  sperm  donation22    must  be observed, as has already 
p.000005:  been practised for years in all the approved centres. Only at the end of this quarantine period is the previously 
p.000005:  described viral serology again tested for the donor23. 
p.000005:   
p.000005:  2.1.3. Recommendations 
p.000005:   
p.000005:  A/  Performance  of  tests  repeated  at  each  donation  is  rather  meaningless  when  the standard quarantine period 
p.000005:  with separate collection is observed. It is much more sound to strictly observe the quarantine rule alone because, in 
p.000005:  this way, negative serology at the end of 180 days points to the absence of contamination. 
p.000005:   
...
           
p.000007:  the ability to identify the recipients in hospitals that use the human body material.  This  also  involves  the 
p.000007:  ability  to  locate  and  identify  all  the  pertinent  data  concerning  the products and materials coming into 
p.000007:  contact with this human body material during the process.” 
p.000007:  29Art. 43 of the “human body material (2008)” law (Transitional provisions and effective date): “After the effective 
p.000007:  date of the present law (14 July 2010, under the terms of the law of 16 June 2009, Art. 46), human body material that 
p.000007:  was collected before this effective date and that is not  traceable cannot be used for human applications but can be 
p.000007:  used for purposes of scientific research.”; Art. 44: “Human body material collected before the effective date of the 
p.000007:  present law can be  used for human application after the effective date of this law insofar as the provisions of the 
p.000007:  present law, with the exception of Articles 10, 12, 20 and 21, are observed.” 
p.000007:   
p.000007:   
p.000007:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000008:  8 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  destruction is an option very difficult to defend; these gametes and embryos have in effect been entrusted by the 
p.000008:  patients with a view to later satisfying their desire for a child. 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  Recommendation 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  The  Committee  therefore  requests  that  the  regulations  be  amended.  Strict  regulations  can have a very 
p.000008:  positive effect in the future, but with regard to the past, only traceability of the origin of the gametes and embryos 
p.000008:  can be provided, not information on the use of solutions and material. 
p.000008:   
p.000008:   
p.000008:  III. Conclusions and recommendations 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  With this opinion, the Committee wishes to draw the attention of the competent authorities to the  ethical  problems 
p.000008:  raised  in  implementation  of  the  Belgian  law  “human  body  material (2008)”  and  its  implementing  decrees  by 
p.000008:  certain  provisions  applied  to  the  Centres  for medically assisted procreation. 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  1.   Article 6, §1, of the Royal Decree “quality and safety standards (2009)”, dealing with (1) the  guarantee  of 
p.000008:  traceability  of  all  human  body  material  (gametes  and  embryos) collected,  procured,  processed,  stored  or 
p.000008:  distributed,  goes  too  far  in  that  it  also involves (2) all the pertinent data on the products and materials 
p.000008:  coming into contact with this human body material. 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  Requirement  (1) poses  no problem;  (2) does, due  to the  fact  that  traceability  of the products  and  materials 
p.000008:  is  required  retroactively,  which  raises  a  significant  ethical problem. 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  2.   In the past, traceability of all these human body materials as well as the products and materials coming into 
p.000008:  contact with them has not been observed in practice. 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  3.   The consequence of this is that thousands of cryopreserved gametes and embryos can no longer serve the purposes 
p.000008:  initially planned, those of satisfying a future desire for pregnancy, even in the patients from whom these human body 
p.000008:  materials come. 
p.000008:   
p.000008:  The Committee unanimously believes that, in this specific case, these regulations are not ethically defensible in their 
p.000008:  consequences. The request is therefore made to the legislator that transitional measures be taken so that these gametes 
p.000008:  and embryos can still be used. The current regulations impose the following biological tests30: 
p.000008:   
...
           
p.000009:  The  Committee  believes  that  it  would  be  more  reasonable  –  scientifically  as  well  as ethically – to 
p.000009:  strictly apply the “quarantine principle”. According to this, (1) biological testing  takes  place  before 
p.000009:  collection(s),  (2)  the  cells  or  tissues  are  frozen,  (3)  the results of the tests are communicated after an 
p.000009:  additional check of the biological tests (after 180 days). 
p.000009:  In the present state of science, given the possibility of vitrifying oocytes and given that there   is   no 
p.000009:  difference   in   viability   or   reproductive   capacity   between   an   oocyte transplanted after vitrification and 
p.000009:  a fresh transplanted oocyte, and that the safety of the  transfer  is  greater  after  6  months  of  vitrification, 
p.000009:  the  Committee  believes  that donation of fresh oocytes should no longer be practiced except in the case of lack of 
p.000009:  vitrified oocytes. 
p.000009:   
p.000009:  4.   Moreover, the “bilingual” nature of the legal and regulatory texts sometimes gives rise to a lack of optimal 
p.000009:  consistency in the meaning of their terms. The Committee stresses the necessity of establishing rigorous correspondence 
p.000009:  between French and Dutch texts that deal with the same material. 
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:   
p.000009:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000010:  10 
p.000010:   
p.000010:  The opinion was prepared in the select commission 2010/4 consisting of: 
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:  Joint chairpersons 
p.000010:   
p.000010:  R. Rubens 
p.000010:  G. Schamps 
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:  Joint reporters 
p.000010:   
p.000010:  R. Rubens 
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:  Members 
p.000010:   
p.000010:  A. Beyers 
p.000010:  N. Gallus 
p.000010:  V. Geenen 
p.000010:  I. Liebaers 
p.000010:  G. Pennings 
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:  Member of the Bureau 
p.000010:  P. Devroey 
p.000010:   
p.000010:  Member of the secretariat 
p.000010:   
p.000010:  B. Orban 
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:  Experts interviewed 
p.000010:   
p.000010:  Prof. A. Delvigne, President of the Belgian Society for Reproductive Medicine (BSRM) Prof. K. Vandewoude, Assistant 
p.000010:  Clinical Director, Intensive Care Department, Ghent University Hospital 
p.000010:  M. P. Ballegeer, Head of the Health Products Division of the Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products (Agence 
p.000010:  Fédérale des Médicaments et des Produits de Santé, AFMPS) 
p.000010:  S. Ziebe, President of the Tissues and Cells Directive Task Force of the European Society of Human Reproduction and 
p.000010:  Embryology (ESHRE) 
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:  The   working   documents   of   the   select   commission   2010/4   –   question,   personal contributions of the 
p.000010:  members, minutes of the meetings, documents consulted – are stored as Annexes  2010/4 at  the documentation centre  of 
p.000010:  the Committee, and can be consulted and copied there. 
p.000010:  *** 
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
p.000010:   
...
General/Other / Public Emergency
Searching for indicator emergency:
(return to top)
           
p.000015:  and apparel, must be provided in each section concerned within the establishment. 
p.000015:  6.  When  the  procedures  for  which  approval  is  requested  involve  storage  of  human  body material, the storage 
p.000015:  conditions necessary to preserve the required properties of the human body material, including key parameters such as 
p.000015:  temperature, humidity or air quality, should be specified. 
p.000015:  7.  Critical  parameters,  including  temperature,  humidity  or  air  quality,  must  be  controlled, monitored and 
p.000015:  recorded to prove their compliance with the required storage conditions. 
p.000015:  8. The storage premises must ensure clear separation and distinction between human body material before release and in 
p.000015:  quarantine, human body material that has been released and human  body  material  that  has  been  rejected,  in  order 
p.000015:  to  prevent  any  confusion  and  cross- contamination between them. In both quarantine areas and storage areas for 
p.000015:  released human body  materials, physically  separated areas  or  secure  storage  or  isolation  systems  are  to be 
p.000015:  provided for storing human body material fulfilling specific criteria. 
p.000015:  The  specific  criteria  cited  are  for  example  the  fact  that  human  body  material  intended  for autologous  or 
p.000015:  deferred  use  is  kept,  or  that  gametes  intended  for  partner  donation  are involved. 
p.000015:  9. The establishment must have written directives and procedures for controlling access to the premises, cleaning and 
p.000015:  maintenance, removal of waste and continuity of services in the event of an emergency. 
p.000015:   
p.000015:  E. Documentation and recording 
p.000015:  1.  A  system  characterised  by  clearly  defined  and  efficient  documentation,  proper  reporting and  registers, 
p.000015:  and  authorised  standard  operating  procedures  should  be  established  for  the procedures  for  which  approval 
p.000015:  is  requested.  Documents  must  be  regularly  revised  and compliant with the law and the present decree. The system 
p.000015:  must guarantee standardisation of the  procedures  performed  and  the  possibility  of  retracing  all  the  steps, 
p.000015:  that  is,  collection, codification,  donor  eligibility,  procurement,  processing,  preservation,  storage, 
p.000015:  transport, distribution or disposal or destruction, including aspects related to quality control and quality assurance. 
p.000015:  2. For any critical activity, the materials, equipment and personnel involved must be identified and documented. 
p.000015:  3.  Any  change  in  the  documents  must  be  checked,  dated,  approved,  documented  and executed without delay by 
p.000015:  authorised personnel in the establishments. 
p.000015:  4.  A  procedure  must  be  established  for  monitoring  documents  to  provide  the  history  of revisions  and 
p.000015:  changes  in  the  documents  and  to  guarantee  that  only  current  versions  of documents are used. 
p.000015:  5.  It  must  be  demonstrated  that  the  data  recorded  are  reliable  and  constitute  a  faithful representation 
p.000015:  of the results. 
p.000015:  6. The data recorded must be legible and indelible. They can be handwritten or recorded in another validated electronic 
p.000015:  system. 
p.000015:  7. Without prejudice to Article 6, §3, paragraph 2 of the present decree, all the data recorded, including basic data, 
...
Orphaned Trigger Words
p.000014:  guarantee that critical parameters are kept within acceptable limits at all times. All equipment with  a  critical 
p.000014:  measurement  function  must  be  calibrated  on  the  basis  of  a  standard  if  one exists. 
p.000014:  3. New and  repaired  equipment  must  be tested upon  installation  and  validated before  use. The results of the 
p.000014:  tests must be documented. 
p.000014:  4.  Maintenance,  inspection,  cleaning  and  disinfection  and  decontamination  of  all  critical equipment must be 
p.000014:  performed regularly; these procedures must be recorded. 
p.000014:  5. Procedures must exist for the operation of each critical piece  of apparatus, detailing the steps to be followed in 
p.000014:  case of malfunction or breakdown. 
p.000014:  6.  Procedures  relating  to  the  operations  for  which  approval  is  requested  must  describe  in detail  the 
p.000014:  characteristics  of  all  the  critical  materials  and  reagents.  Specifications  must  in particular be defined for 
p.000014:  additives (solutions, for example) and packaging materials. Critical reagents  and  materials  must  fulfil  the 
p.000014:  documented requirements  and  characteristics  and, if necessary, the provisions of the Royal Decree of 18 March 1999 
p.000014:  on medical devices and the Royal Decree of 14 November 2001 on medical devices for in vitro diagnosis. 
p.000014:   
p.000014:  D. Facilities/premises 
p.000014:  1. Establishments must have facilities appropriate for the performance of the procedures for which approval is 
p.000014:  requested, in compliance with the standards set by the present directive. 
p.000014:  2. If, in the framework of the procedures, human body material is processed while exposed to the environment, this 
p.000014:  processing must take place in an environment with an established air quality  and  cleanliness  in  order  to  reduce 
p.000014:  the  risk  of  contamination,  including  cross- contamination between donations, as much as possible. 
p.000014:  The efficacy of these measures must be validated and monitored. 
p.000014:  3. Except in the case of item 4, when human body material is exposed to the environment in the course of processing 
p.000014:  without undergoing a subsequent microbial inactivation procedure, an air quality characterised by a particle number and 
p.000014:  a microbial colony count equivalent to those of class A, as defined in Annex 1 of the current European guide to good 
p.000014:  manufacturing practice (GMP) and Annex IV of the Royal Decree of 14 December  2006 on  medications for human and 
p.000014:  veterinary use should be ensured; the background environment must be suitable for the processing of the human body 
p.000014:  material concerned, but must be at least equivalent to class D in the GMP with regard to particle numbers and microbial 
p.000014:  colony count. 
p.000014:  By derogation to the preceding paragraph, it is required that the number of microbial colony units in the background 
p.000014:  environment corresponds at least to class C of the GMP instead of class D in cases of cells that are exposed to the 
p.000014:  environment during processing, as well as for cardiac valves, blood vessels and musculoskeletal system transplants. 
p.000014:  The  condition  specified  in  the  preceding  paragraph  does  not  apply  in  the  case  of use  of a closed 
p.000014:  functional system or for gametes; in this case, it suffices that the number of microbial colony units corresponds to at 
p.000014:  least class D of the GMP. 
p.000014:  4. A less strict environment than that specified in item 3 with regard to class A is acceptable insofar as: 
p.000014:  a) a validated microbial inactivation or final sterilisation procedure is used; 
p.000014:   
p.000014:   
p.000014:  FINAL VERSION 
p.000015:  15 
p.000015:   
p.000015:  b) or it is demonstrated that exposure to a class A environment has a harmful effect on the required properties of the 
p.000015:  human body material concerned; 
p.000015:  c) or it is demonstrated that the method and means of application of the human body material to  the  recipient 
p.000015:  involve  a  risk  of  transmission  of  a  bacterial  or  mycotic  infection  to  the recipient significantly less than 
p.000015:  that presented by transplantation of human body material; 
p.000015:  d) or it is not technically possible to perform the required process in a class A environment, for  example  due  to 
p.000015:  the  necessity  for  having  a  specific piece  of  equipment  that  is  not  fully compatible with class A in the 
p.000015:  processing area. 
p.000015:  5. In the situations described in item 4, letters a) to d), the environment must be specified. It should be proven, 
p.000015:  with supporting documents, that the chosen environment guarantees the required  quality  and  safety,  taking  account 
p.000015:  at  least  of  the  planned  use,  the  method  of application and the immune status of the recipient. Appropriate 
p.000015:  clothing, personal protective equipment and hygiene facilities, as  well as written instructions with regard to hygiene 
p.000015:  and apparel, must be provided in each section concerned within the establishment. 
p.000015:  6.  When  the  procedures  for  which  approval  is  requested  involve  storage  of  human  body material, the storage 
p.000015:  conditions necessary to preserve the required properties of the human body material, including key parameters such as 
p.000015:  temperature, humidity or air quality, should be specified. 
p.000015:  7.  Critical  parameters,  including  temperature,  humidity  or  air  quality,  must  be  controlled, monitored and 
p.000015:  recorded to prove their compliance with the required storage conditions. 
p.000015:  8. The storage premises must ensure clear separation and distinction between human body material before release and in 
p.000015:  quarantine, human body material that has been released and human  body  material  that  has  been  rejected,  in  order 
...
Appendix
Indicator List
| Indicator | Vulnerability | 
|---|
| HIV | HIV/AIDS | 
| access | Access to Social Goods | 
| age | Age | 
| child | Child | 
| disability | Mentally Disabled | 
| embryo | embryo | 
| emergency | Public Emergency | 
| ethnic | Ethnicity | 
| family | Motherhood/Family | 
| hospitalised | hospitalized patients | 
| job | Occupation | 
| opinion | philosophical differences/differences of opinion | 
| parents | parents | 
| physically | Physically Disabled | 
| restricted | Incarcerated | 
| sick | Physically Ill | 
| union | Trade Union Membership | 
Indicator Peers (Indicators in Same Vulnerability)
Trigger Words
capacity
consent
ethics
harm
protect
risk
Applicable Type / Vulnerability / Indicator Overlay for this Input