Council of Europe Treaty Series - No. 195 Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, concerning Biomedical Research * Strasbourg, 25.I.2005 Preamble The member States of the Council of Europe, the other States and the European Community signatories to this Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine (hereinafter referred to as “the Conventionâ€), Considering that the aim of the Council of Europe is the achievement of greater unity between its members and that one of the methods by which this aim is pursued is the maintenance and further realisation of human rights and fundamental freedoms; Considering that the aim of the Convention, as defined in Article 1, is to protect the dignity and identity of all human beings and guarantee everyone, without discrimination, respect for their integrity and other rights and fundamental freedoms with regard to the application of biology and medicine; Considering that progress in medical and biological sciences, in particular advances obtained through biomedical research, contributes to saving lives and improving quality of life; Conscious of the fact that the advancement of biomedical science and practice is dependent on knowledge and discovery which necessitates research on human beings; Stressing that such research is often transdisciplinary and international; Taking into account national and international professional standards in the field of biomedical research and the previous work of the Committee of Ministers and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe in this field; Convinced that biomedical research that is contrary to human dignity and human rights should never be carried out; Stressing the paramount concern to be the protection of the human being participating in research; Affirming that particular protection shall be given to human beings who may be vulnerable in the context of research; (*) The Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community entered into force on 1 December 2009. As a consequence, as from that date, any reference to the European Economic Community shall be read as the European Union. CETS 195 – Human Rights and Biomedicine (Protocol), 25.I.2005 Recognising that every person has a right to accept or refuse to undergo biomedical research and that no one should be forced to undergo such research; Resolving to take such measures as are necessary to safeguard human dignity and the fundamental rights and freedoms of the individual with regard to biomedical research, Have agreed as follows: CHAPTER I – Object and scope Article 1 – Object and purpose Parties to this Protocol shall protect the dignity and identity of all human beings and guarantee everyone, without discrimination, respect for their integrity and other rights and fundamental freedoms with regard to any research involving interventions on human beings in the field of biomedicine. Article 2 – Scope 1 This Protocol covers the full range of research activities in the health field involving interventions on human beings. 2 This Protocol does not apply to research on embryos in vitro. It does apply to research on foetuses and embryos in vivo. 3 For the purposes of this Protocol, the term “intervention†includes: i a physical intervention, and ii any other intervention in so far as it involves a risk to the psychological health of the person concerned. CHAPTER II – General provisions Article 3 – Primacy of the human being The interests and welfare of the human being participating in research shall prevail over the sole interest of society or science. Article 4 – General rule Research shall be carried out freely, subject to the provisions of this Protocol and the other legal provisions ensuring the protection of the human being. Article 5 – Absence of alternatives Research on human beings may only be undertaken if there is no alternative of comparable effectiveness. Article 6 – Risks and benefits 1 Research shall not involve risks and burdens to the human being disproportionate to its potential benefits. 2 CETS 195 – Human Rights and Biomedicine (Protocol), 25.I.2005 2 In addition, where the research does not have the potential to produce results of direct benefit to the health of the research participant, such research may only be undertaken if the research entails no more than acceptable risk and acceptable burden for the research participant. This shall be without prejudice to the provision contained in Article 15 paragraph 2, sub-paragraph ii for the protection of persons not able to consent to research. Article 7 – Approval Research may only be undertaken if the research project has been approved by the competent body after independent examination of its scientific merit, including assessment of the importance of the aim of research, and multidisciplinary review of its ethical acceptability. Article 8 – Scientific quality Any research must be scientifically justified, meet generally accepted criteria of scientific quality and be carried out in accordance with relevant professional obligations and standards under the supervision of an appropriately qualified researcher. CHAPTER III – Ethics committee Article 9 – Independent examination by an ethics committee 1 Every research project shall be submitted for independent examination of its ethical acceptability to an ethics committee. Such projects shall be submitted to independent examination in each State in which any research activity is to take place. 2 The purpose of the multidisciplinary examination of the ethical acceptability of the research project shall be to protect the dignity, rights, safety and well-being of research participants. The assessment of the ethical acceptability shall draw on an appropriate range of expertise and experience adequately reflecting professional and lay views. 3 The ethics committee shall produce an opinion containing reasons for its conclusion. Article 10 – Independence of the ethics committee 1 Parties to this Protocol shall take measures to assure the independence of the ethics committee. That body shall not be subject to undue external influences. 2 Members of the ethics committee shall declare all circumstances that might lead to a conflict of interest. Should such conflicts arise, those involved shall not participate in that review. Article 11 – Information for the ethics committee 1 All information which is necessary for the ethical assessment of the research project shall be given in written form to the ethics committee. 2 In particular, information on items contained in the appendix to this Protocol shall be provided, in so far as it is relevant for the research project. The appendix may be amended by the Committee set up by Article 32 of the Convention by a two-thirds majority of the votes cast. Article 12 – Undue influence The ethics committee must be satisfied that no undue influence, including that of a financial nature, will be exerted on persons to participate in research. In this respect, particular attention must be given to vulnerable or dependent persons. 3 CETS 195 – Human Rights and Biomedicine (Protocol), 25.I.2005 CHAPTER IV – Information and consent Article 13 – Information for research participants 1 The persons being asked to participate in a research project shall be given adequate information in a comprehensible form. This information shall be documented. 2 The information shall cover the purpose, the overall plan and the possible risks and benefits of the research project, and include the opinion of the ethics committee. Before being asked to consent to participate in a research project, the persons concerned shall be specifically informed, according to the nature and purpose of the research: i of the nature, extent and duration of the procedures involved, in particular, details of any burden imposed by the research project; ii of available preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; iii of the arrangements for responding to adverse events or the concerns of research participants; iv of arrangements to ensure respect for private life and ensure the confidentiality of personal data; v of arrangements for access to information relevant to the participant arising from the research and to its overall results; vi of the arrangements for fair compensation in the case of damage; vii of any foreseen potential further uses, including commercial uses, of the research results, data or biological materials; viii of the source of funding of the research project. 3 In addition, the persons being asked to participate in a research project shall be informed of the rights and safeguards prescribed by law for their protection, and specifically of their right to refuse consent or to withdraw consent at any time without being subject to any form of discrimination, in particular regarding the right to medical care. Article 14 – Consent 1 No research on a person may be carried out, subject to the provisions of both Chapter V and Article 19, without the informed, free, express, specific and documented consent of the person. Such consent may be freely withdrawn by the person at any phase of the research. 2 Refusal to give consent or the withdrawal of consent to participation in research shall not lead to any form of discrimination against the person concerned, in particular regarding the right to medical care. 3 Where the capacity of the person to give informed consent is in doubt, arrangements shall be in place to verify whether or not the person has such capacity. 4 CETS 195 – Human Rights and Biomedicine (Protocol), 25.I.2005 CHAPTER V – Protection of persons not able to consent to research Article 15 – Protection of persons not able to consent to research 1 Research on a person without the capacity to consent to research may be undertaken only if all the following specific conditions are met: i the results of the research have the potential to produce real and direct benefit to his or her health; ii research of comparable effectiveness cannot be carried out on individuals capable of giving consent; iii the person undergoing research has been informed of his or her rights and the safeguards prescribed by law for his or her protection, unless this person is not in a state to receive the information; iv the necessary authorisation has been given specifically and in writing by the legal representative or an authority, person or body provided for by law, and after having received the information required by Article 16, taking into account the person’s previously expressed wishes or objections. An adult not able to consent shall as far as possible take part in the authorisation procedure. The opinion of a minor shall be taken into consideration as an increasingly determining factor in proportion to age and degree of maturity; v the person concerned does not object. 2 Exceptionally and under the protective conditions prescribed by law, where the research has not the potential to produce results of direct benefit to the health of the person concerned, such research may be authorised subject to the conditions laid down in paragraph 1, sub- paragraphs ii, iii, iv, and v above, and to the following additional conditions: i the research has the aim of contributing, through significant improvement in the scientific understanding of the individual's condition, disease or disorder, to the ultimate attainment of results capable of conferring benefit to the person concerned or to other persons in the same age category or afflicted with the same disease or disorder or having the same condition; ii the research entails only minimal risk and minimal burden for the individual concerned; and any consideration of additional potential benefits of the research shall not be used to justify an increased level of risk or burden. 3 Objection to participation, refusal to give authorisation or the withdrawal of authorisation to participate in research shall not lead to any form of discrimination against the person concerned, in particular regarding the right to medical care. Article 16 – Information prior to authorisation 1 Those being asked to authorise participation of a person in a research project shall be given adequate information in a comprehensible form. This information shall be documented. 2 The information shall cover the purpose, the overall plan and the possible risks and benefits of the research project, and include the opinion of the ethics committee. They shall further be informed of the rights and safeguards prescribed by law for the protection of those not able to consent to research and specifically of the right to refuse or to withdraw authorisation at any time, without the person concerned being subject to any form of discrimination, in particular 5 CETS 195 – Human Rights and Biomedicine (Protocol), 25.I.2005 regarding the right to medical care. They shall be specifically informed according to the nature and purpose of the research of the items of information listed in Article 13. 3 The information shall also be provided to the individual concerned, unless this person is not in a state to receive the information. Article 17 – Research with minimal risk and minimal burden 1 For the purposes of this Protocol it is deemed that the research bears a minimal risk if, having regard to the nature and scale of the intervention, it is to be expected that it will result, at the most, in a very slight and temporary negative impact on the health of the person concerned. 2 It is deemed that it bears a minimal burden if it is to be expected that the discomfort will be, at the most, temporary and very slight for the person concerned. In assessing the burden for an individual, a person enjoying the special confidence of the person concerned shall assess the burden where appropriate. CHAPTER VI – Specific situations Article 18 – Research during pregnancy or breastfeeding 1 Research on a pregnant woman which does not have the potential to produce results of direct benefit to her health, or to that of her embryo, foetus or child after birth, may only be undertaken if the following additional conditions are met: i the research has the aim of contributing to the ultimate attainment of results capable of conferring benefit to other women in relation to reproduction or to other embryos, foetuses or children; ii research of comparable effectiveness cannot be carried out on women who are not pregnant; iii the research entails only minimal risk and minimal burden. 2 Where research is undertaken on a breastfeeding woman, particular care shall be taken to avoid any adverse impact on the health of the child. Article 19 – Research on persons in emergency clinical situations 1 The law shall determine whether, and under which protective additional conditions, research in emergency situations may take place when: i a person is not in a state to give consent, and ii because of the urgency of the situation, it is impossible to obtain in a sufficiently timely manner, authorisation from his or her representative or an authority or a person or body which would in the absence of an emergency situation be called upon to give authorisation. 2 The law shall include the following specific conditions: i research of comparable effectiveness cannot be carried out on persons in non- emergency situations; ii the research project may only be undertaken if it has been approved specifically for emergency situations by the competent body; 6 CETS 195 – Human Rights and Biomedicine (Protocol), 25.I.2005 iii any relevant previously expressed objections of the person known to the researcher shall be respected; iv where the research has not the potential to produce results of direct benefit to the health of the person concerned, it has the aim of contributing, through significant improvement in the scientific understanding of the individual's condition, disease or disorder, to the ultimate attainment of results capable of conferring benefit to the person concerned or to other persons in the same category or afflicted with the same disease or disorder or having the same condition, and entails only minimal risk and minimal burden. 3 Persons participating in the emergency research project or, if applicable, their representatives shall be provided with all the relevant information concerning their participation in the research project as soon as possible. Consent or authorisation for continued participation shall be requested as soon as reasonably possible. Article 20 – Research on persons deprived of liberty Where the law allows research on persons deprived of liberty, such persons may participate in a research project in which the results do not have the potential to produce direct benefit to their health only if the following additional conditions are met: i research of comparable effectiveness cannot be carried out without the participation of persons deprived of liberty; ii the research has the aim of contributing to the ultimate attainment of results capable of conferring benefit to persons deprived of liberty; iii the research entails only minimal risk and minimal burden. CHAPTER VII – Safety and supervision Article 21 – Minimisation of risk and burden 1 All reasonable measures shall be taken to ensure safety and to minimise risk and burden for the research participants. 2 Research may only be carried out under the supervision of a clinical professional who possesses the necessary qualifications and experience. Article 22 – Assessment of health status 1 The researcher shall take all necessary steps to assess the state of health of human beings prior to their inclusion in research, to ensure that those at increased risk in relation to participation in a specific project be excluded. 2 Where research is undertaken on persons in the reproductive stage of their lives, particular consideration shall be given to the possible adverse impact on a current or future pregnancy and the health of an embryo, foetus or child. Article 23 – Non-interference with necessary clinical interventions 1 Research shall not delay nor deprive participants of medically necessary preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. 2 In research associated with prevention, diagnosis or treatment, participants assigned to control groups shall be assured of proven methods of prevention, diagnosis or treatment. 7 CETS 195 – Human Rights and Biomedicine (Protocol), 25.I.2005 3 The use of placebo is permissible where there are no methods of proven effectiveness, or where withdrawal or withholding of such methods does not present an unacceptable risk or burden. Article 24 – New developments 1 Parties to this Protocol shall take measures to ensure that the research project is re-examined if this is justified in the light of scientific developments or events arising in the course of the research. 2 The purpose of the re-examination is to establish whether: i the research needs to be discontinued or if changes to the research project are necessary for the research to continue; ii research participants, or if applicable their representatives, need to be informed of the developments or events; iii additional consent or authorisation for participation is required. 3 Any new information relevant to their participation shall be conveyed to the research participants, or, if applicable, to their representatives, in a timely manner. 4 The competent body shall be informed of the reasons for any premature termination of a research project. CHAPTER VIII – Confidentiality and right to information Article 25 – Confidentiality 1 Any information of a personal nature collected during biomedical research shall be considered as confidential and treated according to the rules relating to the protection of private life. 2 The law shall protect against inappropriate disclosure of any other information related to a research project that has been submitted to an ethics committee in compliance with this Protocol. Article 26 – Right to information 1 Research participants shall be entitled to know any information collected on their health in conformity with the provisions of Article 10 of the Convention. 2 Other personal information collected for a research project will be accessible to them in conformity with the law on the protection of individuals with regard to processing of personal data. Article 27 – Duty of care If research gives rise to information of relevance to the current or future health or quality of life of research participants, this information must be offered to them. That shall be done within a framework of health care or counselling. In communication of such information, due care must be taken in order to protect confidentiality and to respect any wish of a participant not to receive such information. 8 CETS 195 – Human Rights and Biomedicine (Protocol), 25.I.2005 Article 28 – Availability of results 1 On completion of the research, a report or summary shall be submitted to the ethics committee or the competent body. 2 The conclusions of the research shall be made available to participants in reasonable time, on request. 3 The researcher shall take appropriate measures to make public the results of research in reasonable time. CHAPTER IX – Research in States not parties to this Protocol Article 29 – Research in States not parties to this Protocol Sponsors or researchers within the jurisdiction of a Party to this Protocol that plan to undertake or direct a research project in a State not party to this Protocol shall ensure that, without prejudice to the provisions applicable in that State, the research project complies with the principles on which the provisions of this Protocol are based. Where necessary, the Party shall take appropriate measures to that end. CHAPTER X – Infringement of the provisions of the Protocol Article 30 – Infringement of the rights or principles The Parties shall provide appropriate judicial protection to prevent or to put a stop to an unlawful infringement of the rights or principles set forth in this Protocol at short notice. Article 31 – Compensation for damage The person who has suffered damage as a result of participation in research shall be entitled to fair compensation according to the conditions and procedures prescribed by law. Article 32 – Sanctions Parties shall provide for appropriate sanctions to be applied in the event of infringement of the provisions contained in this Protocol. CHAPTER XI – Relation between this Protocol and other provisions and re-examination of the Protocol Article 33 – Relation between this Protocol and the Convention As between the Parties, the provisions of Articles 1 to 32 of this Protocol shall be regarded as additional articles to the Convention, and all the provisions of the Convention shall apply accordingly. Article 34 – Wider protection None of the provisions of this Protocol shall be interpreted as limiting or otherwise affecting the possibility for a Party to grant research participants a wider measure of protection than is stipulated in this Protocol. 9 CETS 195 – Human Rights and Biomedicine (Protocol), 25.I.2005 Article 35 – Re-examination of the Protocol In order to monitor scientific developments, the present Protocol shall be examined within the Committee referred to in Article 32 of the Convention no later than five years from the entry into force of this Protocol and thereafter at such intervals as the Committee may determine. CHAPTER XII – Final clauses Article 36 – Signature and ratification This Protocol shall be open for signature by Signatories to the Convention. It is subject to ratification, acceptance or approval. A Signatory may not ratify, accept or approve this Protocol unless it has previously or simultaneously ratified, accepted or approved the Convention. Instruments of ratification, acceptance or approval shall be deposited with the Secretary General of the Council of Europe. Article 37 – Entry into force 1 This Protocol shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the expiration of a period of three months after the date on which five States, including at least four member States of the Council of Europe, have expressed their consent to be bound by the Protocol in accordance with the provisions of Article 36. 2 In respect of any Signatory which subsequently expresses its consent to be bound by it, the Protocol shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the expiration of a period of three months after the date of the deposit of the instrument of ratification, acceptance or approval. Article 38 – Accession 1 After the entry into force of this Protocol, any State which has acceded to the Convention may also accede to this Protocol. 2 Accession shall be effected by the deposit with the Secretary General of the Council of Europe of an instrument of accession which shall take effect on the first day of the month following the expiration of a period of three months after the date of its deposit. Article 39 – Denunciation 1 Any Party may at any time denounce this Protocol by means of a notification addressed to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe. 2 Such denunciation shall become effective on the first day of the month following the expiration of a period of three months after the date of receipt of such notification by the Secretary General. Article 40 – Notifications The Secretary General of the Council of Europe shall notify the member States of the Council of Europe, the European Community, any Signatory, any Party and any other State which has been invited to accede to the Protocol of: a any signature; b the deposit of any instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession; 10 CETS 195 – Human Rights and Biomedicine (Protocol), 25.I.2005 c any date of entry into force of this Protocol in accordance with Articles 37 and 38; d any other act, notification or communication relating to this Protocol. In witness whereof the undersigned, being duly authorised thereto, have signed this Protocol. Done at Strasbourg, this 25th day of January 2005, in English and in French, both texts being equally authentic, in a single copy which shall be deposited in the archives of the Council of Europe. The Secretary General of the Council of Europe shall transmit certified copies to each member State of the Council of Europe, to the non-member States which have participated in the elaboration of this Protocol, to any State invited to accede to the Convention and to the European Community. 11